ReviewInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2022
A Review of Parallel Implementations for the Smith-Waterman Algorithm.
Review in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- SpaBalance: Balanced Learning for Efficient Spatial Multi-Omics Decoding.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- A survey of sequence-to-graph mapping algorithms in the pangenome era.Genome biology · 2025Review
- Fast noisy long read alignment with multi-level parallelism.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid advances in sequencing technology have led to an explosion of sequence data. Sequence alignment is the central and fundamental problem in many sequence analysis procedure, while local alignment is often the kernel of these algorithms. Usually, Smith-Waterman algorithm is used to find the best subsequence match between given sequences. However, the high time complexity makes the algorithm time-consuming. A lot of approaches have been developed to accelerate and parallelize it, such as vector-level parallelization, thread-level parallelization, process-level parallelization, and heterogeneous acceleration, but the current researches seem unsystematic, which hinders the further research of parallelizing the algorithm. In this paper, we summarize the current research status of parallel local alignments and describe the data layout in these work. Based on the research status, we emphasize large-scale genomic comparisons. By surveying some typical alignment tools' performance, we discuss some possible directions in the future. We hope our work will provide the developers of the alignment tool with technical principle support, and help researchers choose proper alignment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.