Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34487325›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2021

Fruit wrapping kraft coated paper promotes the isolation of actinobacteria using ex situ and in situ methods.

Faezeh Almasi, Maghsoud Kafshnouchi, Fatemeh Mohammadipanah, Javad Hamedi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 56% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Faezeh AlmasiDepartment of Microbial Biotechnology, School of Biology and Center of Excellence in Phylogeny of Living Organisms, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, 14155-6455, Iran.
Maghsoud KafshnouchiDepartment of Microbial Biotechnology, School of Biology and Center of Excellence in Phylogeny of Living Organisms, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, 14155-6455, Iran.
Fatemeh MohammadipanahDepartment of Microbial Biotechnology, School of Biology and Center of Excellence in Phylogeny of Living Organisms, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, 14155-6455, Iran.
Javad HamediDepartment of Microbial Biotechnology, School of Biology and Center of Excellence in Phylogeny of Living Organisms, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, 14155-6455, Iran. jhamedi@ut.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0491-2205
University of Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Designing novel isolation methods could enhance the diversification of the available bacterial strains to biotechnology. In this study, the new ex situ and in situ cultivation methods are introduced for the isolation of actinobacteria. In the ex situ experiments, the soil suspension was spread on the isolation media located above some ordinary papers in immediate contact with the slurry of soil substrate and incubated for 16 weeks. The paper was wholly immersed in the cave soil for in situ cultivations, and the containers were buried under layers of soil in Hampoeil cave for 10 weeks. Fruit wrapping kraft coated paper, with 68.8% recovery of isolates, was a better choice in isolation of actinobacteria than other studied filter paper. Based on the molecular identification results, 19% of the isolates obtained from the in situ cultivation method had less than 98.5% similarity to known taxa of actinobacteria and potentially may represent new species. In contrast, in the standard cultivation method, 1.3% of the isolates had less than 98.5% similarity 16Sr RNA gene. This data shows that the introduced cultivation method is a promising technique for isolating less culturable or new actinobacteria.

Indexed as

ActinobacteriaBacteriaFruitPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil MicrobiologyRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID34487325
OpenAlexW3198530209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.