ArticleClinical rheumatology2022
Patient feedback identifies "Rheum" to improve clinic visit preparedness.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare providers and administrators are incorporating patient feedback to drive local health system improvement. Improvement interventions, including patient feedback, guided a novel approach for rheumatology patient appointment preparedness. We tested the interventions in a single rheumatology clinic. A comprehensive patient questionnaire was developed by assessing patients' clinic access using patient journey mapping. The questionnaire was administered to a random cohort of 125 rheumatology patients about their feedback on pre-clinic practices. From the responses, modifications were made to existing administrative practices within the clinic. The modified practices were tested with an additional cohort of 10 patients aligned to one rheumatologist, assessing overall patients' preparedness and clinic visit cycle time. It was identified from the questionnaire that during appointment booking, inconsistent pre-clinic planning information was communicated to patients and the appointment package did not support patient preparedness, resulting in extending clinic visits. Standardization of the appointment phone call script, updating the appointment package, and inclusion of a clinic visit preparation checklist, reduced the clinic visit cycle time by 10 minutes for new patients, and 5 minutes for existing patients. The participating clinic rheumatologist also perceived improved patient preparedness and clinic visit flow based on the modified practices. In this study, patient feedback was used to identify patient-centred interventions to improve patient preparedness at clinic visits. The interventions developed were simple and easy to incorporate into practice. Systematic collection of and strategies based on patient feedback was determined to be a valid, meaningful method for incorporating clinical quality improvement. KEY POINTS : • Structured patient feedback can inform quality improvement practices in a rheumatological clinic setting. • A patient journey map outlining healthcare clinic access can help to understand patient experiences and needs. • Simple, patient-centred interventions, such as an appointment package and a consistent telephone reminder script, improved patient preparedness and reduced average clinic cycle time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34487281What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.