Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34487250›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2021

Swedish translation and cross-cultural adaptation of eight pediatric item banks from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

Ida Blomqvist, John Eric Chaplin, Evalill Nilsson, Eva Henje, Inga Dennhag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ida BlomqvistDepartment of Clinical Science, Child- and Adolescent Psychiatry, Umeå University, 90185, Umeå, Sweden. ida.blomqvist@umu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0487-5552
John Eric ChaplinDepartment of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8128-4225
Evalill NilssonDepartment of Medicine and Optometry, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4497-8313
Eva HenjeDepartment of Clinical Science, Child- and Adolescent Psychiatry, Umeå University, 90185, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5790-0518
Inga DennhagDepartment of Clinical Science, Child- and Adolescent Psychiatry, Umeå University, 90185, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7336-1657

Funding

Visare Norr VISARENORR837841Visare Norr VISARENORR930204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study is part of the Swedish initiative for the establishment of standardized, modern patient-reported measures for national use in Swedish healthcare. The goal was to translate and culturally adapt eight pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS

methodsAuthorization to translate all currently available pediatric PROMIS item banks (autumn, 2016) into Swedish was obtained from the PROMIS Health Organization. The translation followed the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy translation recommendations with one major modification, which was the use of a bilingual multi-professional review workshop. The following steps were applied: translation, reconciliation, a two-day multi professional reviewer workshop, back translation, and cognitive debriefing with eleven children (8-17 years) before final review. The bilingual multi-professional review workshop provided a simultaneous, in-depth assessment from different professionals. The group consisted of questionnaire design experts, researchers experienced in using patient-reported measures in healthcare, linguists, and pediatric healthcare professionals.

resultsAll item banks had translation issues that needed to be resolved. Twenty-four items (20.7%) needed resolution at the final review stage after cognitive debriefing. The issues with translations included 1. Lack of matching definitions with items across languages (6 items); 2. Problems related to language, vocabulary, and cultural differences (6 items); and 3. Difficulties in adaptation to age-appropriate language (12 items).

conclusionsThe translated and adapted versions of the eight Swedish pediatric PROMIS item banks are linguistically acceptable. The next stage will be cross-cultural validation studies in Sweden. Despite the fact that there are cultural differences between Sweden and the United States, our translation processes have successfully managed to address all issues. Expert review groups from already-established networks and processes regarding pediatric healthcare throughout the country will facilitate the future implementation of pediatric PROMIS item banks in Sweden.

Indexed as

Cultural adaptationItem bankLinguistic validationPediatric PROMISQuestionnaireTranslation

Identifiers

PMID34487250
PMCPMC8421493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.