Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34487218›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Cochlear implantation under local anesthesia in 117 cases: patients' subjective experience and outcomes.

Aarno Dietz, Thomas Lenarz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Expression of Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide and Its Application to Cochlear Implantation Under Local Anesthesia With Monitored Anesthesia Care in the Very Elderly: The University of California, Los Angeles, Experience.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The cost-effectiveness of unilateral cochlear implantation in the Finnish health care.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aarno DietzDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Kuopio University Hospital, PO. Box 100, 70029, Kuopio, Finland. aarno.dietz@kuh.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6076-1037
Thomas LenarzDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9307-5989
Kuopio University Hospital · FIMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

Academy of Finland 333525pohjois-savon rahasto 65191840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report the outcomes and the patients' subjective experience of cochlear implantation (CI) performed under local anesthesia (LA). To describe a new form of intraoperative cochlear monitoring based on the patients subjective sound perception during CI.

methodsIn this retrospective case-cohort study, 117 patients underwent CI under LA with (n = 58) or without conscious sedation (n = 59). Included were primarily elderly patients with elevated risks for general anesthesia and recently patients with residual hearing eligible for electro-acoustic stimulation (EAS) (n = 27), in whom hearing could be monitored during the electrode insertion. A 500 Hz test tone was presented and the patient reported  of subjective changes in loudness, leading to a modification of the insertion. A questionnaire was sent to all patients in which they assessed their subjective experience.

resultsAll patients were successfully operated under LA without the need to intraoperatively convert to general anesthesia. 90% of the patients reported that the surgery was a positive experience. The vast majority, 90% of patients were satisfied with the overall treatment and with intraoperative pain management and 84% of the patients would opt for local anesthesia again. Cochlear monitoring by the patients' subjective sound perception enabled for atraumatic insertions as all EAS patients could hear the test tone up to the end of the surgery.

conclusionsCI under LA was well tolerated and recommended by the vast majority of patients. In addition, it offers the possibility to monitor the patients' hearing during the electrode insertion, which may help to prevent insertion trauma.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionAgedAnesthesia, LocalAuditory ThresholdCohort StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCochlear implantationConsious sedationElderlyHearing preservationLocal anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID34487218
PMCPMC8419376
OpenAlexW3198378337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.