Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34487201›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2022

Fracture fixation in extremity trauma with carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) plates: evidence today.

George D Chloros, Apostolos D Prodromidis, Jo Wilson, Peter V Giannoudis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Carbon-fibre plates for traumatic and (impending) pathological fracture fixation: Where do we stand? A systematic review.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Surgeons' perspective on the use of carbon fibre plates for extremity fracture fixation.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Patient perspective on the use of carbon fibre plates for extremity fracture fixation.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

George D ChlorosAcademic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Apostolos D ProdromidisAcademic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Jo WilsonInvibio Biomaterial Solutions Ltd, Hillhouse International, Thornton-Cleveleys, Lancashire, UK.
Peter V GiannoudisAcademic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. pgiannoudi@aol.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5205-7696
University of Leeds · GBChapel Allerton Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the CFR-PEEK plates with conventional plates in fracture fixation with regards to clinical and radiological outcomes and complications.

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in four online databases independently by two reviewers using the Cochrane methodology for systematic reviews. The identified relevant studies were assessed against predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Independent data extraction and assessment of risk of bias and study quality was carried out.

resultsNine studies (patient n = 361) out of 6594 records were included for analysis: 2 RCTs (n = 63), 3 prospective cohort studies (n = 151), and 4 retrospective cohort studies (n = 147). Studies were grouped per anatomic area of fixation. Four studies (n = 200) examined fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Two studies (n = 74) examined fixation of distal radius fractures. Two studies (n = 53) assessed outcomes of fixation of distal femur fractures. One study (n = 87) assessed the outcomes of fixation of ankle fractures. All nine studies reported very high union rates (from 91% in distal femur to 100% in upper limb) for the CFR-PEEK plate groups and low complication rates. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes, and rate of complications as compared to the conventional plate groups.

conclusionCFR-PEEK plates have high union rates in extremity fracture fixation similar to conventional plates with comparable good clinical outcomes and a very low and comparable rate of complications. Considering their advantages, CFR-PEEK plates seem to be valid alternative to conventional plating.

Indexed as

Bone PlatesKetonesBenzophenonesCarbon FiberExtremitiesFracture Fixation, InternalHumansPolyethylene GlycolsPolymersProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSystematic Reviews as TopicTreatment OutcomeBenzophenonesCarbon FiberKetonespolyetheretherketonePolyethylene GlycolsPolymersCarbon fiber platesComplicationsFracture fixationOutcomesPolyetheretherketone

Identifiers

PMID34487201
PMCPMC9192460
OpenAlexW3198369287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.