ReviewDer Radiologe2021
[Structured reporting in daily practice-status quo and future].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoding collaboration obstacles: a survey on reporting preferences between neuroradiologists and clinical specialists.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical/methodical issueIntroduction and application of structured reporting in radiology private practice. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
methodsUltrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), digital x‑ray (DR), mammography (MG). METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: Structuring and predefinition of entire reports and report parts. PERFORMANCE: Structured reporting in radiology presumably allows for higher report quality, reproducibility and easier access to data mining. Also the communication with the referring physicians can be improved. Although these advantages are well acknowledged, structured reporting does not prevail in private radiology practices. This article sheds light on the current situation of structured reporting in radiology private practice and provides information for the faltering implementation as well as perspective for individual potential solutions to overcome this situation. ACHIEVEMENTS: Structured reporting is not yet standard. Growing acceptance of structured reporting can be expected. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The application of structured reporting can improve report quality. The use of structured reporting should be considered for common examinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34487199What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.