Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34487189›Full record

ArticleArchives of microbiology2021

The evaluation of five commercial bacteriophage cocktails against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from nasal swab samples.

Hilal Basak Erol, Banu Kaskatepe, Zekiye Bakkaloglu, Serap Suzuk Yildiz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. In Vitro Susceptibility of Clinical and Carrier Strains ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hilal Basak ErolDepartment of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Ankara University Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara, Turkey.
Banu KaskatepeDepartment of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Ankara University Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara, Turkey. bkaskatepe@ankara.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9722-4267
Zekiye BakkalogluDepartment of Microbiology Reference Laboratory and Biological Product, MoH General Directorate of Public Health, Ankara, Turkey.
Serap Suzuk YildizDepartment of Microbiology Reference Laboratory and Biological Product, MoH General Directorate of Public Health, Ankara, Turkey.
Ankara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are a growing concern for public health resulting in increase in morbidity, length of hospital stay, and cost of treatment. MRSA nasal swab screening may give clinicians additional information for decision of empiric antimicrobial agents. While increasing antibiotic resistance leads to new treatment approaches, bacteriophages are one of the most promising methods for these alternatives. It was aimed to determine the effectiveness of bacteriophages against MRSA isolates. Nasal swab samples were collected from outpatients without any evidence of infection who applied to Hatay, Mersin and Gaziantep family and immigration health centers. A series (35) were isolated from Turkish patients, and G series (64) were isolated from Syrian immigrants. Methicillin resistance was determined phenotypically and genotypically. Also, antibiotic susceptibilities of all isolates were determined against erythromycin, clindamycin, gentamicin, linezolid, rifampicin, and mupirocin. The total antimicrobial resistance rates of isolates were found to be 11%, 28%, 8%, 5%, 16%, 19%, and 29% respectively. The high susceptibility rate against ciprofloxacin (88.8%) was remarkable. The overall susceptibility of MRSA strains to ENKO, INTESTI, PYO, SES, and staphylococcal bacteriophages was 67.7%, 55.5%, 53.5%, 61.6% and 44.4%, respectively. The antibiotic susceptibility rates (except erythromycin) and efficacy of bacteriophages were higher in group A. Considering that high efficacy rates were not achieved in the study and the sensitivity rates of Turkish isolates to all phages were found to be higher than those of Syrian isolates, searching for phages in the geographic regions where the pathogen is common may be helpful to obtain suitable phages for treatment.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic susceptibilityCommercial phage effectivityMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID34487189
OpenAlexW3178660480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.