ArticleNeuro-oncology2022
Machine learning approach to differentiation of peripheral schwannomas and neurofibromas: A multi-center study.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applications of artificial intelligence in peripheral neurosurgery: a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of imaging in facial nerve tumors.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Foundation artificial intelligence models enable high-accuracy diagnostic differentiation of hybrid neurofibroma/schwannoma using whole-slide images.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Radiomics Applied to the Diagnosis of Peripheral Nerve Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Existing Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Ongoing Clinical Challenges in Nerve Surgery (Nerve SPACE 2025).Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
- Hybrid neurofibroma/schwannoma in schwannomatosis-a diagnostically challenging benign peripheral nerve sheath tumour.Familial cancer · 2025Review
- Development and validation of an interpretable shap-based machine learning model for predicting postoperative complications in laryngeal cancer.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Radiomics Analysis Based on Optical Coherence Tomography to Prognose the Efficacy of Anti-VEGF Therapy of Retinal Vein Occlusion-Related Macular Edema.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Clinical-radiomics models with machine-learning algorithms to distinguish uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis in adults: a multiphase multicenter cohort study.Gastroenterology report · 2025Article
- MRI features of benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors: how do sporadic and syndromic tumors differ?Skeletal radiology · 2024Article
- BPNSTs: In the eye of the beholder.Neuro-oncology · 2022Article
- Establishment and Optimization of Radiomics Algorithms for Prediction of KRAS Gene Mutation by Integration of NSCLC Gene Mutation Mutual Exclusion Information.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Classification of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Based on Radiomic Analysis.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNon-invasive differentiation between schwannomas and neurofibromas is important for appropriate management, preoperative counseling, and surgical planning, but has proven difficult using conventional imaging. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate machine learning approaches for differentiating peripheral schwannomas from neurofibromas.
methodsWe assembled a cohort of schwannomas and neurofibromas from 3 independent institutions and extracted high-dimensional radiomic features from gadolinium-enhanced, T1-weighted MRI using the PyRadiomics package on Quantitative Imaging Feature Pipeline. Age, sex, neurogenetic syndrome, spontaneous pain, and motor deficit were recorded. We evaluated the performance of 6 radiomics-based classifier models with and without clinical features and compared model performance against human expert evaluators.
resultsOne hundred and seven schwannomas and 59 neurofibromas were included. The primary models included both clinical and imaging data. The accuracy of the human evaluators (0.765) did not significantly exceed the no-information rate (NIR), whereas the Support Vector Machine (0.929), Logistic Regression (0.929), and Random Forest (0.905) classifiers exceeded the NIR. Using the method of DeLong, the AUCs for the Logistic Regression (AUC = 0.923) and K Nearest Neighbor (AUC = 0.923) classifiers were significantly greater than the human evaluators (AUC = 0.766; p = 0.041).
conclusionsThe radiomics-based classifiers developed here proved to be more accurate and had a higher AUC on the ROC curve than expert human evaluators. This demonstrates that radiomics using routine MRI sequences and clinical features can aid in differentiation of peripheral schwannomas and neurofibromas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.