Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34487094›Full record

ArticleActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2021

Rheumatoid Arthritis disease activity assessment in routine care: performance of the most widely used composite disease activity indices and patient-reported outcome measures.

Fausto Salaffi, Marco Di Carlo, Sonia Farah, Daniela Marotto, Fabiola Atzeni, Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fausto SalaffiRheumatology Clinic, Ospedale "Carlo Urbani", Università Politecnica delle Marche, Jesi (Ancona), Italy. fausto.salaffi@gmail.com.
Marco Di CarloRheumatology Clinic, Ospedale "Carlo Urbani", Università Politecnica delle Marche, Jesi (Ancona), Italy . dica.marco@yahoo.it.
Sonia FarahRheumatology Clinic, Ospedale "Carlo Urbani", Università Politecnica delle Marche, Jesi (Ancona), Italy . sonia.farah91@gmail.com.
Daniela MarottoRheumatology Unit, ATS Sardegna, P. Dettori Hospital, Tempio Pausania, Italy . daniela.marotto@tiscali.it.
Fabiola AtzeniRheumatology Unit, Department of Internal and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy. atzenifabiola@hotmail.com.
Piercarlo Sarzi-PuttiniRheumatology Unit, Internal Medicine Department, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan University School of Medicine, Milan, Italy. piercarlo.sarziputtini@gmail.com.
Marche Polytechnic University · ITASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco · ITUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimTo evaluate the convergent and discriminative validity of many continuous composite disease activity indices and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

methodsIn consecutive RA patients in moderate or high disease activity, according to the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) definition, were computed four additional composite disease activity indices, the 28-joint Disease Activity Score - erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), the Chronic Arthritis Systemic Index (CASI), and the Mean Overall Index for RA (MOI-RA), and five PROMs, the Patients' Activity Scale (PAS), the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID), the 5-item RA Disease Activity Index (RADAI-5), the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3), and the Clinical Arthritis Activity (PRO-CLARA). Spearman's rho correlation coefficients were determined to assess their convergent validity, and discriminative performance was calculated by the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC-ROC). The patients' opinion of their symptomatic status (PASS) was used as the external criterion.

results246 RA patients with moderate (29.3%) or high disease activity (70.7%) have been assessed. The indices all showed a significant correlation (p <0.0001 for all). Among the composite disease activity indices, the CDAI was the one that showed the best discriminating ability compared to the PASS (AUC = 0.962), while among the PROMs the RAID was the most performing (AUC = 0.879).

conclusionsCDAI as composite index of disease activity, and RAID as PROM, are the two instruments with the best performances in relation to PASS. The use of validated disease activity measures can help in clinical practice to adopt treat-to-target strategies in RA patients. (www.actabiomedica.it).

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidBlood SedimentationHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34487094
PMCPMC8477094
OpenAlexW3197742691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.