Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34487082›Full record

ArticleActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2021

Development and Validation of a Questionnaire investigating the Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Healthcare Workers in the Field of Anesthesiology concerning the Italian Law on Advance Healthcare Directives: a Pilot Study.

Alessandro Bonsignore, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Chiara Basile, Paolo Pelosi, Angelo Gratarola, Giulia Bonatti, Nicolò Patroniti, Rosagemma Ciliberti

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06245525 (Palliative Care and Legal Aspects of Treatment Limitation Decisions in ICU), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06245525 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Palliative Care and Legal Aspects of Treatment Limitation Decisions in ICU: A Survey of Clinicians' Perceptions

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of AthensRan2024 to 2025Enrolled523ConditionsEnd of LifeArmsThis is not an interventional study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Alessandro BonsignoreUniversity of Genoa. alessandro.bonsignore@unige.it.
Nicola Luigi BragazziYork University. bragazzi@yorku.ca.
Chiara BasileUniversity of Genoa. chiara.basil@gmail.com.
Paolo PelosiUniversity of Genoa. ppelosi@hotmail.com.
Angelo GratarolaUniversity of Genoa. angelo.gratarola@hsanmartino.it.
Giulia BonattiUniversity of Genoa. giulia.bonatti@gmail.com.
Nicolò PatronitiUniversity of Genoa. npatroniti@gmail.com.
Rosagemma CilibertiUniversity of Genoa. ciliberti@unige.it.
University of Genoa · ITMedtronic (Ireland) · IEYork University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advance healthcare directives are legal documents, in which the patient, foreseeing a potential loss of capacity and autonomy, makes in advance decisions regarding future care and, in particular, end-of-life arrangements. In Italy, advance healthcare directives  are regulated by the Law 219 of 22 December 2017. Objectives of the study were: i) to develop and validate a questionnaire dedicated to evaluate the knowledge of the Law in a sample of 98 anesthesiologists, and ii) to shed light on the process of health-related decision-making and its determinants (age, gender, doctor/training resident, religious beliefs). A second part of the survey  not analyzed  in the present study, aimed to assess, through two simulated clinical scenarios, how patient' directives, relatives and the medical staff could influence physicians' clinical decision. Overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the questionnaire resulted 0.83. Three factors explaining up to 38.4% of total variance (communication and relationship with the patient; critical life-threatening situations and binding nature of the advance directive for the physician; and involvement of patients). Most of the doctors (58.7%) did not fully know the recent legislative provision. The lack of knowledge is critical in view of the specificity of the clinical area investigated (anesthesiology and intensive care), which has to cope with ethical issues. An adequate revision and implementation of the traditional curricula could help medical students and trainees develop the aptitudes and skills needed in their future profession.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdvance DirectivesHealth PersonnelHumansItalyPilot ProjectsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34487082
PMCPMC8477106
OpenAlexW3196424917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.