ArticleActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2021
Metabolic syndrome and breast cancer: a dangerous association for postmenopausal women.
Article in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk Factors and Prevention of Cancer and CVDs: A Chicken and Egg Situation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Composite dietary antioxidant index is associated with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in females: results from NHANES 2011-2016.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Digital Rehabilitation Program for Breast Cancer Survivors on Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy: A Feasibility Study.Cancers · 2024Article
- Impact of a Physical Exercise and Health Education Program on Metabolic Syndrome and Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Women Undergoing Adjuvant Treatment with Aromatase Inhibitors.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Association between insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and its components and lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer(BC) is the most common cancer in women worldwide, the relationship between metabolic syndrome(MetS) and BC needs to be better clarified. Today the early diagnosis of breast cancer(BC) is yet a challenging problem in clinical practice, so the evidence that a well identified population of postmenopausal women, affected by MetS, presents a high risk, of breast cancer occurrence, is useful for breast cancer prevention. Our study aims to assess the prevalence of metabolic syndrome, diagnosed according to current guidelines, in postmenopausal women with breast cancer, and its role as an independent risk factor.
resultsMetS rate was significantly higher among women affected by BC:10.1%, 33 women, than CG:5.4%, 18 women, Chi-squared4.8,Odds ratio1.94,c.i.95%,p<0.02. Metabolic cardiomyopathy rate was significantly higher among women affected by BC:5.8%, 18 women, than CG:1.8%, 6 women, Chi-squared6.5,Odds ratio3.2,c.i.95%,p<0.01. Otherwise MetS rate without cardiomyopathy was higher among women affected by BC:4.8%, 15 women, than CG:3.4%, 11 women, but in a not statistically significant way, Chi-squared0.8,Odds ratio1.35,c.i.95%,p<0.36.
conclusionThere was a significant relationship, in our population, between MetS and BC, adding evidence to this controversial association, the relationship was even tighter, when restricted to women affected by metabolic cardiomyopathy; otherwise it, restricted to women affected by MetS, without metabolic cardiomyopathy, was not statistically significant. Since the prevalence of MetS is increasing worldwide, just like the incidence of BC, an intervention is needed to improve physical activity and weight reduction to decrease the MetS rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.