Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34487041›Full record

ReviewJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2021

An Integrative Literature Review on the Nomenclature and Definition of Dementia at a Young Age.

Dennis van de Veen, Christian Bakker, Kirsten Peetoom, Yolande Pijnenburg, Janne M Papma, PRECODE Study Group, Marjolein de Vugt, Raymond Koopmans

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Blood biomarker profiles in young-onset neurocognitive disorders: A cohort study.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Strengthening the National Care System for Young Onset Dementia.International journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dennis van de VeenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Christian BakkerDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Kirsten PeetoomAlzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Yolande PijnenburgAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Janne M PapmaDepartment of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
PRECODE Study Group
Marjolein de VugtDepartment of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Raymond KoopmansDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been growing interest in young people living with dementia. Future research requires consensus on the terminology and operational definition of this group.

objectiveThe purpose of this integrative review was to explore and include all operational definitions used to define dementia at a young age.

methodsOn August 14, 2020, the PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, and PsycInfo databases were searched for empirical and theoretical literature using Google. Various terms to describe and define 'dementia' and 'at a young age' were used to collect literature concerning terminology; age-related aspects, including cut-off ages and criteria; and etiologies of dementia at a young age.

resultsThe search yielded 6,891 empirical and 4,660 theoretical publications, resulting in the inclusion of 89 publications, including 36 publications containing an explicit discussion and 53 publications as confirmation. 'Young-onset dementia' was the most commonly used term of seven identified terms, in the last two decades. The age of 65 years at symptom onset was used most frequently when considering a total of six upper age limits and four criteria to define a cut-off age. Eight lower age limits and an option for subdivision based on age were included. We identified 251 different etiologies and 27 categories of etiologies.

conclusionDespite relative consensus on the term young-onset dementia and an age at symptom onset being used as a cut-off criterion, much is still unclear concerning possible etiologies of dementia at a young age. In the current study, controversies were detected for discussion in an international consensus study.

Indexed as

ConsensusDementiaTerminology as TopicAge FactorsHumansDefinitionoperationalizationyoung-onset dementia

Identifiers

PMID34487041
PMCPMC8609678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.