ArticleeLife2021
Motor planning under uncertainty.
Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain Dynamics Underlying Reaching Movements Under Uncertainty.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Predictive use of environmental regularities requires action relevance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Disentangling decision uncertainty and motor noise in curved movement trajectories.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Neuroscience of Behavior.NeuroSci · 2025Review
- Mental graphs structure the storage and retrieval of visuomotor associations.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- Sequential effects in reaching reveal efficient coding in motor planning.Science advances · 2025Article
- Online Movements Reflect Ongoing Deliberation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Cerebellar reaching ataxia is exacerbated by timing demands and assistive interaction torques.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Differential Beta and Gamma Activity Modulation during Unimanual and Bimanual Motor Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Tiny visual latencies can profoundly impair implicit sensorimotor learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sequential Effects in Reaching Reveal Efficient Coding in Motor Planning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Motor actions across psychiatric disorders: A research domain criteria (RDoC) perspective.Clinical psychology review · 2024Review
- The cerebellum acts as the analog to the medial temporal lobe for sensorimotor memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Ouvrai opens access to remote virtual reality studies of human behavioural neuroscience.Nature human behaviour · 2024Article
- The influence of foreperiod duration on the preparation and control of sequential aiming movements.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024Article
- Continuous evaluation of cost-to-go for flexible reaching control and online decisions.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Deciding While Acting-Mid-Movement Decisions Are More Strongly Affected by Action Probability than Reward Amount.eNeuro · 2023Article
- The role of consciously timed movements in shaping and improving auditory timing.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Review
- A neurocomputational theory of action regulation predicts motor behavior in neurotypical individuals and patients with Parkinson's disease.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Actions often require the selection of a specific goal amongst a range of possibilities, like when a softball player must precisely position her glove to field a fast-approaching ground ball. Previous studies have suggested that during goal uncertainty the brain prepares for all potential goals in parallel and averages the corresponding motor plans to command an intermediate movement that is progressively refined as additional information becomes available. Although intermediate movements are widely observed, they could instead reflect a neural decision about the single best action choice given the uncertainty present. Here we systematically dissociate these possibilities using novel experimental manipulations and find that when confronted with uncertainty, humans generate a motor plan that optimizes task performance rather than averaging potential motor plans. In addition to accurate predictions of population-averaged changes in motor output, a novel computational model based on this performance-optimization theory accounted for a majority of the variance in individual differences between participants. Our findings resolve a long-standing question about how the brain selects an action to execute during goal uncertainty, providing fundamental insight into motor planning in the nervous system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.