Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34486442›Full record

ArticleNursing ethics2022

Coping with moral distress on acute psychiatric wards: A qualitative study.

Trine-Lise Jansen, Marit Helene Hem, Lars Johan Danbolt, Ingrid Hanssen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing ethics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Trine-Lise JansenLovisenberg diakonale høgskole (Lovisenberg Diaconal University College), Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7378-2208
Marit Helene Hem87368VID Specialized University, Norway.
Lars Johan DanboltMF Norwegian School of Theology, Religion and Society, Norway.
Ingrid Hanssen155319Lovisenberg diakonale høgskole (Lovisenberg Diaconal University College), Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1720-8911

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurses working within acute psychiatric settings often face multifaceted moral dilemmas and incompatible demands.

methodsQualitative individual and focus group interviews were conducted. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Approval was received from the Norwegian Social Science Data Services. Ethical Research Guidelines were followed. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: Thirty nurses working within acute psychiatric wards in two mental health hospitals.

resultsVarious coping strategies were used: mentally sorting through their ethical dilemmas or bringing them to the leadership, not 'bringing problems home' after work or loyally doing as told and trying to make oneself immune. Colleagues and work climate were important for choice of coping strategies. DISCUSSION: Nurses' coping strategies may influence both their clinical practice and their private life. Not facing their moral distress seemed to come at a high price.

conclusionsIt seems essential for nurses working in acute psychiatric settings to come to terms with distressing events and identify and address the moral issues they face. As moral distress to a great extent is an organisational problem experienced at a personal level, it is important that a work climate is developed that is open for ethical discussions and nourishes adaptive coping strategies and moral resilience.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalPsychiatric Department, HospitalHumansMoralsNorwayQualitative ResearchStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesAcute psychiatrycopingmental health nursesmoral distressnurses

Identifiers

PMID34486442
PMCPMC8866740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.