ArticleControl Conference (ECC) ... European. European Control Conference2020
Estimation of general time-varying single particle tracking linear models using local likelihood.
Article in Control Conference (ECC) ... European. European Control Conference, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Estimation Algorithm for General Linear Single Particle Tracking Models with Time-Varying Parameters.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Model Segmentation in Single Particle Tracking.IFAC-PapersOnLine · 2021Article
- A time-varying approach to single particle tracking with a nonlinear observation model.Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference. American Control Conference · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, we study a general approach to the estimation of single particle tracking models with time-varying parameters. The main idea is to use local Maximum Likelihood (ML), applying a sliding window over the data and estimating the model parameters in each window. We combine local ML with Expectation Maximization to iteratively find the ML estimate in each window, an approach that is amenable to generalization to nonlinear models. Results using controlled-experimental data generated in our lab show that our proposed algorithm is able to track changes in the parameters as they evolve during a trajectory under real-world experimental conditions, outperforming other algorithms of similar nature.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.