Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34485855›Full record

ArticleiScience2021

Odor-evoked increases in olfactory bulb mitral cell spiking variability.

Cheng Ly, Andrea K Barreiro, Shree Hari Gautam, Woodrow L Shew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cheng LyDepartment of Statistical Sciences and Operations Research, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA.
Andrea K BarreiroDepartment of Mathematics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275, USA.
Shree Hari GautamDepartment of Physics, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Woodrow L ShewDepartment of Physics, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spiking variability of neural networks has important implications for how information is encoded to higher brain regions. It has been well documented by numerous labs in many cortical and motor regions that spiking variability decreases with stimulus onset, yet whether this principle holds in the OB has not been tested. In stark contrast to this common view, we demonstrate that the onset of sensory input can cause an increase in the variability of neural activity in the mammalian OB. We show this in both anesthetized and awake rodents. Furthermore, we use computational models to describe the mechanisms of this phenomenon. Our findings establish sensory evoked increases in spiking variability as a viable alternative coding strategy.

Indexed as

Biological SciencesCellular NeuroscienceComputing MethodologySensory Neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID34485855
PMCPMC8397902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.