Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34485810›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice2021

Multisensory Facilitation of Working Memory Training.

Anja Pahor, Cindy Collins, Rachel N Smith, Austin Moon, Trevor Stavropoulos, Ilse Silva, Elaine Peng, Susanne M Jaeggi, Aaron R Seitz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05396586 (Assessment and Training of Cognitive Function), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05396586 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Assessment and Training of Cognitive Function

TypeinterventionalSponsorNortheastern UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled313ConditionsCognitive ChangeArmsN-back, Span, Multisensory
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anja PahorUniversity of California, Riverside, Department of Psychology, Riverside, California, USA.
Cindy CollinsUniversity of California, Riverside, Department of Psychology, Riverside, California, USA.
Rachel N SmithUniversity of California, Irvine, School of Education, Irvine, California, USA.
Austin MoonUniversity of California, Riverside, Department of Psychology, Riverside, California, USA.
Trevor StavropoulosUniversity of California, Riverside, Department of Psychology, Riverside, California, USA.
Ilse SilvaUniversity of California, Riverside, Department of Psychology, Riverside, California, USA.
Elaine PengUniversity of California, Riverside, Department of Psychology, Riverside, California, USA.
Susanne M JaeggiUniversity of California, Irvine, School of Education, School of Social Sciences (Department of Cognitive Sciences), Irvine, California, USA.
Aaron R SeitzUniversity of California, Riverside, Department of Psychology, Riverside, California, USA.

Funding

Understanding Mediating and Moderating Factors that Determine Transfer of Working Memory TrainingR01MH111742 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI Susanne M Jaeggi, Aaron R Seitz · 2016 to 2026
$5.1M
Cognitive Training and Brain Plasticity - Towards an Understanding of Mediators and ModeratorsK02AG054665 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI JAEGGI, SUSANNE M · 2017 to 2021
$806k
NIA NIH HHS K02 AG054665NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research suggests that memorization of multisensory stimuli benefits performance compared to memorization of unisensory stimuli; however, little is known about multisensory facilitation in the context of working memory (WM) training and transfer. To investigate this, 240 adults were randomly assigned to an N-back training task that consisted of visual-only stimuli, alternating visual and auditory blocks, or audio-visual (multisensory) stimuli, or to a passive control group. Participants in the active groups completed 13 sessions of N-back training (6.7 hours in total) and all groups completed a battery of WM tasks: untrained N-back tasks, Corsi Blocks, Sequencing, and Symmetry Span. The Multisensory group showed similar training N-level gain compared to the Visual Only group, and both of these groups outperformed the Alternating group on the training task. As expected, all three active groups significantly improved on untrained visual N-back tasks compared to the Control group. In contrast, the Multisensory group showed significantly greater gains on the Symmetry Span task and to a certain extent on the Sequencing task compared to other groups. These results tentatively suggest that incorporating multisensory objects in a WM training protocol can benefit performance on the training task and potentially facilitate transfer to complex WM span tasks.

Indexed as

multisensorytrainingtransferworking memory

Identifiers

PMID34485810
PMCPMC8415034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.