Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34485764›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in systems biology2021

Programmatic modeling for biological systems.

Alexander L R Lubbock, Carlos F Lopez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in systems biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Biotechnology Data Analysis Training with Jupyter Notebooks.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexander L R LubbockDepartment of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States of America.
Carlos F LopezDepartment of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States of America.

Funding

Single-Cell Biology and Data Analysis Shared Resource (SCB-DA SR)U54CA217450 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WEAVER, ALISSA M · 2018 to 2022
$8.5M
Phenotype Transitions in Small Cell Lung CancerU01CA215845 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LOPEZ, CARLOS FEDERICO, QUARANTA, VITO · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA215845NCI NIH HHS U54 CA217450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational modeling has become an established technique to encode mathematical representations of cellular processes and gain mechanistic insights that drive testable predictions. These models are often constructed using graphical user interfaces or domain-specific languages, with community standards used for interchange. Models undergo steady state or dynamic analysis, which can include simulation and calibration within a single application, or transfer across various tools. Here, we describe a novel programmatic modeling paradigm, whereby modeling is augmented with software engineering best practices. We focus on Python - a popular programming language with a large scientific package ecosystem. Models can be encoded as programs, adding benefits such as modularity, testing, and automated documentation generators, while still being extensible and exportable to standardized formats for use with external tools if desired. Programmatic modeling is a key technology to enable collaborative model development and enhance dissemination, transparency, and reproducibility.

Identifiers

PMID34485764
PMCPMC8411905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.