ArticleHeliyon2021
Scanning acoustic microscopy imaging of cellular structural and mechanical alterations from external stimuli.
Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selective deletion or preservation of tissue components via enzymatic digestion monitored by scanning acoustic microscopy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Pelvic floor muscle injury during a difficult labor. Can tissue fatigue damage play a role?International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cells incur structural and functional damage from external stimuli. Under scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM), speed of sound (SOS), attenuation, and thickness values are plotted to visualize cellular stiffness, viscosity, and size. The obtained digital data are then compared using statistical analysis. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the alterations in the mechanical and structural characteristics of cancer cells in response to anticancer drugs, acidic fluids, and microwave burdens using SAM. We found that active untreated cells showed increased thickness and reduced SOS and attenuation, whereas dying treated cells displayed reduced thickness and increased SOS. Tannic and acetic acid treatments and microwave irradiation all increased SOS and attenuation and reduced thickness, which meant that these treatments made cells thinner, stiffer, and more viscous. Furthermore, the different anticancer drugs interacted with cancer cells to induce characteristic changes in SAM values. These structural and mechanical alterations induced in cells were difficult to observe under light microscopy. However, under SAM, cancer cell activity and function corresponded consistently with changes in SAM values. Cellular damage parameters were statistically compared between the different treatments, and time-dependent cellular changes were established. SAM observation can therefore reliably evaluate cancer cell damage and recovery after chemotherapy and physical therapy. These results may help evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of various treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.