ArticleHeliyon2021
Optimization of deep neural network-based human activity recognition for a wearable device.
Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing Sensor and Data Selection on Lower Limbs via Deep Learning for Real-Time Human Activity Recognition.IEEE transactions on human-machine systems · 2026Article
- Estimation of walking energy expenditure using a single sacrum-mounted IMU based on biomechanically-informed machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence Based Approach for Classification of Human Activities Using MEMS Sensors Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- IMU-Based Classification of Locomotion Modes, Transitions, and Gait Phases with Convolutional Recurrent Neural Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Human Activity Recognition Based on Embedded Sensor Data Fusion for the Internet of Healthcare Things.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human activity recognition (HAR) attempts to classify performed activities from data retrieved from different sensors attached to the body. Most publications pertaining to HAR based on deep neural networks (DNNs) report the development of a suitable architecture to improve recognition accuracy by increasing the parameters of the architecture. Our work follows a different approach by attempting to optimise DNN-based HAR by reducing the dimensions of acceleration data, by finding a suitable sample size for processing by the DNN and by reducing the parameters of the proposed architecture. The experiments rely on employing two previously presented DNN-based HAR architectures as the baselines and starting points to create our candidate architectures. The variations in the dimensions of acceleration data, i.e., {
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.