Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34485695›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources

Becoming Active Bystanders and Advocates: Teaching Medical Students to Respond to Bias in the Clinical Setting.

Michelle York, Kyle Langford, Mario Davidson, Celeste Hemingway, Regina Russell, Maya Neeley, Amy Fleming

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Seeking Racial Equity in Hematology and Oncology: a Fellow-Led Educational Series to Promote Reflection and Action.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michelle YorkMedical Student, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1275-1253
Kyle LangfordMedical Student, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine.
Mario DavidsonAssistant Professor, Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
Celeste HemingwayAssistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
Regina RussellAssistant Professor, Department of Medical Education and Administration, Vanderbilt University.
Maya NeeleyAssistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
Amy FlemingAssociate Dean of Student Affairs, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIncidents of bias and microaggressions are prevalent in the clinical setting and are disproportionately experienced by racial minorities, women, and medical students. These incidents contribute to burnout. Published efforts to address these incidents are growing, but gaps remain regarding the long-term efficacy of these curricular models. We developed and longitudinally evaluated a workshop that taught medical students a framework to respond to incidents of bias or microaggressions.

methodsIn October 2019, 102 Vanderbilt core clerkship medical students participated in an hour-long, interactive, case-based workshop centered around the 3 D's response behavior framework: (1) direct, (2) distract, and (3) delegate. Participants were surveyed before and after the training, and both qualitative and quantitative data were collected. A refresher workshop was offered 8 months later, which added two additional D's: delay and display discomfort.

resultsAfter the workshop, respondents' knowledge of the assessed topics improved significantly, as did their confidence in addressing both personally experienced and witnessed incidents. Respondents initially indicated a high likelihood of using response behaviors to address incidents. The workshop did not consistently modify behavioral responses to experienced or witnessed incidents. Ninety-one percent of respondents agreed the workshop was effective. DISCUSSION: This workshop provided an effective curriculum to sustainably improve participant knowledge and confidence in responding to incidents of bias and microaggressions. This resource can be adopted by educators at other institutions.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalCurriculumFemaleHumansAnti-RacismBiasBystanderCase-Based LearningMicroaggression

Identifiers

PMID34485695
PMCPMC8374028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.