Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34485693›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2021

Cancer Treatment During COVID-19: A Qualitative Analysis of Patient-Perceived Risks and Experiences with Virtual Care.

Gotlib Conn Lesley, Houman Tahmasebi, Nicholas Meti, Frances C Wright, Alia Thawer, Matthew Cheung, Simron Singh

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Enduring Effects of COVID for Cancer Care: Learning from Real-Life Clinical Practice.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Experiences of cancer care in COVID-19: A longitudinal qualitative study.European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society · 2022
    Article
  10. Patients' experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic and the change to telephone consultations in cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Telehealth cancer care consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of the experiences of Australians affected by cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Exploring nursing engagement in providing virtual care to cancer patients in Canada.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gotlib Conn LesleyEvaluative Clinical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3769-5590
Houman TahmasebiEvaluative Clinical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Nicholas MetiOdette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Canada.
Frances C WrightOdette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Canada.
Alia ThawerDepartment of Pharmacy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Canada.
Matthew CheungEvaluative Clinical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Simron SinghEvaluative Clinical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, most cancer centers shifted from in-person to virtual cancer care to curb community spread and ensure care continuity. This qualitative descriptive study aimed to understand cancer patient-perceived risks related to COVID-19 and cancer treatment, as well as the patient-perceived and experienced value of virtual care. From June to August 2020, focus groups were conducted with patients under active management or observation for a diagnosed malignancy in Toronto, Canada. A thematic analysis of six focus groups found that most participants worried more about treatment delays than they did about COVID-19 infection. Despite some concern about COVID-19 exposure in the hospital, care delays contributed to increased anxiety among participants who already subscribed to strict safety measures in their everyday lives. Most participants accepted virtual care for some appointment types; however, preference for in-person care was found to sustain the humanistic and therapeutic aspects of cancer care that many participants valued. Nuances in the appropriateness and adequacy of virtual cancer care still need exploration. Preserving the humanistic aspects of care is of paramount importance.

Indexed as

CancerCOVID-19qualitative methodstelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34485693
PMCPMC8411616
OpenAlexW3197813711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.