Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34485674›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2021

Development of an instrument to measure perceived gentrification for health research: Perceptions about changes in environments and residents (PACER).

Jana A Hirsch, Heidi E Grunwald, Keisha L Miles, Yvonne L Michael

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Journal of community practice · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Gentrification and Air Quality in a Large Urban County in the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jana A HirschUrban Health Collaborative, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Heidi E GrunwaldInstitute for Survey Research, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Keisha L MilesInstitute for Survey Research, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Yvonne L MichaelUrban Health Collaborative, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Longitudinal Neighborhood Determinants of ADRD Progression within a Multi-Site CohortR01AG072634 · NIA · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI Jana Ariel Hirsch · 2021 to 2026
$6.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG072634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a myriad of potential pathways linking neighborhood change and gentrification to health, existing quantitative measures failed to capture individual-level, self-reported perceptions of these processes. We developed the Perceptions About Change in Environment and Residents (PACER) survey to measure the gentrification-related neighborhood change experienced by individuals relevant to health. We employed a multi-stage process to develop PACER including a scoping review, question refinement, content validity, and cognitive interviews. Content validity and cognitive interviews were assessed within the National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership (NNIP) and for residents of different tenure in both gentrifying and non-gentrifying neighborhoods to ensure PACER considers the complex nature of neighborhood change for different people within different urban contexts. We piloted the instrument to a sample from the resident panel BeHeardPhilly to assess acceptability and data quality. Finally, we assessed internal consistency, dimensionality, and criterion-related validity using Principal Components Analysis (PCA), descriptive statistics, and correlation coefficients. Testing showed good internal consistency for PACER questions, as well as for each of four resulting factors (Feelings, Built Environment, Social Environment, and Affordability). Correlations between factors and other context measures demonstrated strong criterion-related validity. PACER offers an unprecedented tool for measuring and understanding resident perceptions about gentrification-related neighborhood change relevant to health. Rigorously tested and tailored for health, PACER holds utility for application across different settings to examine changes from events that may impact and shift neighborhoods.

Indexed as

BHP, BeHeardPhilly Municipal PanelDisplacementEnvironmentGentrificationISR, Institute for Survey ResearchNCGS, Neighborhood Change and Gentrification ScaleNeighborhoodNNIP, National Neighborhood Indicators ProjectPACER, Perceptions About Change in Environment and ResidentsPANJAAPOR, Pennsylvania and New Jersey American Association for Public Opinion ResearchPCA, Principal Components AnalysisSocial determinants of healthSurvey methodology

Identifiers

PMID34485674
PMCPMC8399084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.