ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2021
Quantitative parameters for diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension on brain MRI.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretation of increased intracranial pressure findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging in headache patients.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of machine-learning using conventional magnetic resonance imaging markers for pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a retrospective study.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Structural MRI Biomarkers of Intracranial Pressure in IIH: Linking Optic Nerve Sheath, Pituitary Morphology, and Hormonal Changes.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Idiopathic ıntracranial hypertension: diagnostic contribution of novel MRI parameters and their relationship with CSF pressure.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Article
- How can MRI descriptors be optimally combined to predict idiopathic intracranial hypertension?The British journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Magnetic resonance signs of intracranial hypertension in children: a retrospective case-control study.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: Imaging and clinical fundamentals.World journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Article
- A rare finding of bilateral facial canal meningoceles involving the tympanic segment in suspected idiopathic intracranial hypertension.Radiology case reports · 2023Article
- How to understand an enlarged Meckel's cave? An anatomical study.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2023Article
- Efficacy of Dural Sinus Quantitative Measurements in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension : A Practical Diagnostic Feature.Clinical neuroradiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAim of this study was to develop quantitative parameters for diagnosing Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH) using brain MRI scans.
methodsThis is a case control study with 48 cases and 192 matched controls. Optic nerve diameter (OND), Pituitary height (PH), Meckel's cave diameter (MCD), and Neck fat thickness (NFT) were measured for both groups. Consequently, means were obtained for the different parameters in both groups with subsequent establishment of best cutoffs using Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) analysis.
resultsFor IIH patients the means of OND, PH, MCD, and NFT were 6.2 mm, 3.9 mm, 5 mm, 1.4 cm, respectively while for controls the means were 4.6 mm, 4.5 mm, 4.3 mm, and 0.8 cm with statistical significance between the two groups. ROC analysis showed the cutoff points with best accuracy for the above parameters in diagnosing IIH to be 5.4 mm for OND with sensitivity of 0.77 and specificity of 0.85 representing high accuracy, while for PH a cutoff point of 3 mm showed low accuracy with sensitivity of 0.54 and specificity of 0.7, and a MCD cutoff of 4.5 mm also showed low accuracy with sensitivity of 0.6 and specificity of 0.59, meanwhile a cutoff point of 1.1 cm for NFT was moderately accurate with sensitivity of 0.70 and specificity of 0.81.
conclusionStatistical difference in the means for OND, PH, MCD, and NFT between IIH patients and controls is established. Also, we provide cut off points for these parameters to diagnose IIH on brain MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.