ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2021
Evaluation of medical student program with the use of a reflective portfolio: A qualitative study.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perspectives of Nursing Students on Promoting Reflection in the Clinical Setting: A Qualitative Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2022Article
- Evaluating e-Learning in the Pathology Course During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Advances in medical education and practice · 2022Article
- Asynchronous E-learning after synchronous E-learning in the pathology course. When is the proper time for this transition?Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe concept of reflective practice is at the center of professional practice, allowing a bridge between theory and practice and learning from our own experiences in an ongoing process. Understanding what learners need such as regular observation of work, more responsibility, and technical and problem-solving with answers allows the teacher to help learners to progress to independence in pursing their own learning needs. Therefore, it is important that medical educators continually reflect and evaluate teaching ability to meet learners' needs and provide evidence to support it. MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective, qualitative study was carried out using a combination of questionnaires and observed assessments. The study participants consisted of twenty final-year medical students from King's College London and took place at a hospital education center in the UK, April 2019. Two educational sessions were delivered by a doctor to the study group and a video recording was conducted. The educator completed a reflective portfolio using feedback questionnaires, peer observation forms, and observation of the video recording, and the results were analyzed using a video critique tool.
resultsTwenty learner feedback forms were completed, and a peer observation form was completed. This allowed a critical analysis of educator performance, reflection, and improvement. This was further solidified by in-depth analysis and critique of teaching session playback video. DISCUSSION: This study evaluates a medical student teaching program using a reflective portfolio. This study confirms the effectiveness of using a reflective portfolio to enhance the teaching experience. Video analysis can be self-critical, however this study shows how it is useful to review human experience first-hand, and identifying any specific techniques that create a positive or negative change can enable educators to improve as time progresses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.