Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34485525›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2021

COVID-19 Vaccine, TRIPS, and Global Health Diplomacy: India's Role at the WTO Platform.

Vijay Kumar Chattu, Bawa Singh, Jaspal Kaur, Mihajlo Jakovljevic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Health technology assessment for digital health Technologies in India: a framework for action.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Access to medicines through global health diplomacy.Health promotion perspectives · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vijay Kumar ChattuDivision of Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C4.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9840-8335
Bawa SinghDepartment of South and Central Asian Studies, School of International Studies, Central University of Punjab, PIN-151401, Bathinda, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4832-0938
Jaspal KaurDepartment of law, Guru Nanak Dev University, Regional Campus, Jalandhar, Punjab 144007, India.
Mihajlo JakovljevicDepartment of Global Health Economics and Policy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9160-6846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In light of the devastation caused by COVID-19, the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and vaccine research and development (R&D) have been occupying a prominent position in the field of global health diplomacy (GHD). Most countries, international organizations, and charitable organizations have been engaged in the R&D of COVID-19 vaccines to ensure timely affordability and accessibility to all countries. Concomitantly, the World Trade Organization (WTO) provides some provisions and enforcements regarding copyrights, patents, trademarks, geographical indications, and industrial designs. Given these safeguards, it is considered that intellectual property rights (IPRs) have become major barriers to the affordability and accessibility of vaccines/medicines/technology, particularly to the developing/least developed countries. Realizing the gravity of the pandemic impact, as well as its huge population and size, India has elevated this issue in its global health diplomacy by submitting a joint proposal with South Africa to the World Trade Organization (WTO) for a temporary waiver of IPRs to ensure timely affordability and accessibility of COVID-19 medical products to all countries. However, the issue of the temporary waive off had become a geopolitical issue. Countries that used to claim per se as strong advocates of human rights, egalitarianism, and healthy democracy have opposed this proposal. In this contrasting milieu, this paper is aimed at examining how the TRIPS has become a barrier for developing countries' development and distribution of vaccines/technology; secondly, how India strategizes its role in the WTO in pursuant of its global health diplomacy? We conclude that the IPRs regime should not become a barrier to the accessibility/affordability of essential drugs and vaccines. To ensure access, India needs to get more engaged in GHD with all the involved global stakeholders to get strong support for their joint proposal. The developed countries that rejected/resisted the proposal can rethink their full support.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesDiplomacyDrug IndustryGlobal HealthHealth Services AccessibilityHuman RightsHumansIndiaPublic HealthSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34485525
PMCPMC8416375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.