Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34485518›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2021

Biomechanics in Removable Partial Dentures: A Literature Review of FEA-Based Studies.

Mohammed A Mousa, Johari Yap Abdullah, Nafij B Jamayet, Mohamed I El-Anwar, Kiran Kumar Ganji, Mohammad Khursheed Alam, Adam Husein

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Preliminary Evaluation of Large Language Models in Kennedy Classification and Removable Partial Denture Planning: An In Silico Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohammed A MousaProsthodontic Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6268-6824
Johari Yap AbdullahCraniofacial Imaging and Additive Manufacturing Laboratory, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6147-4192
Nafij B JamayetDivision of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Bukit Jalil, Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4656-0946
Mohamed I El-AnwarMechanical Engineering Department, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9840-0579
Kiran Kumar GanjiDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakakah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad Khursheed AlamDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakakah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7131-1752
Adam HuseinProsthodontic Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5962-6110
Jouf University · SAHospital Universiti Sains Malaysia · MYIMU University · MYNational Research Centre · EGUniversiti Sains Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was aimed at reviewing the studies that used finite element analysis (FEA) to estimate the biomechanical stress arising in removable partial dentures (RPDs) and how to optimize it. A literature survey was conducted for the English full-text articles, which used only FEA to estimate the stress developed in RPDs from Jan 2000 to May 2021. In RPDs, the retaining and supporting structures are subjected to dynamic loads during insertion and removal of the prosthesis as well as during function. The majority of stresses in free-end saddle (FES) RPDs are concentrated in the shoulder of the clasp, the horizontal curvature of the gingival approaching clasp, and the part of the major connector next to terminal abutments. Clasps fabricated from flexible materials were beneficial to eliminate the stress in the abutment, while rigid materials were preferred for major connectors to eliminate the displacement of the prosthesis. In implant-assisted RPD, the implant receive the majority of the load, thereby reducing the stress on the abutment and reducing the displacement of the prosthesis. The amount of stress in the implant decreases with zero or minimal angulation, using long and wide implants, and when the implants are placed in the first molar area.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiomechanical PhenomenaDental AbutmentsDental ImplantsDenture DesignDenture, Partial, RemovableFinite Element AnalysisHumansStress, MechanicalDental Implants

Identifiers

PMID34485518
PMCPMC8416386
OpenAlexW3198593450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.