Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34485414›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021

A Primer on Repeated Sitting Exposure and the Cardiovascular System: Considerations for Study Design, Analysis, Interpretation, and Translation.

Lee Stoner, Bethany Barone Gibbs, Michelle L Meyer, Simon Fryer, Daniel Credeur, Craig Paterson, Keeron Stone, Erik D Hanson, Robert J Kowalsky, Masahiro Horiuchi and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sedentary Time and Breast Cancer Risk in the Sister Study Cohort.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Scoping Review of Acute Sedentary Behaviour Studies of People with Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lee StonerDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Bethany Barone GibbsDepartment of Health and Human Development and Clinical and Translational Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Michelle L MeyerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Simon FryerSchool of Sport and Exercise, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucester, United Kingdom.
Daniel CredeurDepartment of Biology, Ave Maria University, Ave Maria, FL, United States.
Craig PatersonSchool of Sport and Exercise, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucester, United Kingdom.
Keeron StoneSchool of Sport and Exercise, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucester, United Kingdom.
Erik D HansonDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Robert J KowalskyDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX, United States.
Masahiro HoriuchiDivision of Human Environmental Science, Mount Fuji Research Institute, Yamanashi, Japan.
Christopher P MackDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Gaurav DaveDivision of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

Funding

Genetic and epigenetic regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype and contractilityR01HL109607 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MACK, CHRISTOPHER P. · 2012 to 2022
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL109607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sedentary behavior, particularly sitting, is ubiquitous in many contemporary societies. This is a major societal concern considering the evidence for a strong association between sitting behavior and cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Unsurprisingly, leading public health agencies have begun to advocate "reduction" in sitting behavior. Though, the guidelines are typically vague and non-specific. The lack of specific guidelines for prolonged sitting is attributable to the absence of available evidence to facilitate guideline development. To inform policy, well-designed randomized controlled trials are required to test the efficacy of specific and translatable sitting reduction strategies. To guide the design of randomized controlled trials, this review postulates that several gaps in the literature first need to be filled. Following a general discussion of the importance of sitting behavior to contemporary societies, each of the following are discussed: (i) acute sitting exposure and systems physiology; (ii) recommendations for a systems physiology toolbox; (iii) study design considerations for acute sitting exposure; and (iv) translation of sitting-focused research.

Indexed as

arterial stiffnessbiological plausibilityecological validityendothelial functionexternal validityinternal validitymethodologysedentary behavior

Identifiers

PMID34485414
PMCPMC8415972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.