ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021
Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Chronic Coronary Syndromes.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of whole heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023Pooled it
- Automated Coronary Optical Coherence Tomography Feature Extraction with Application to Three-Dimensional Reconstruction.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Pooled it
- The heart's hidden blueprint: a rare variant of coronary artery origin from the right coronary cusp.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Trends in Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease-Related Mortality in Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation (1999-2023): A CDC WONDER Database Analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2026Article
- Targeted respiratory regulation and precision diaphragm localization improve efficiency and image quality: a comparison between conventional and improved four-dimensional flow cardiac magnetic resonance in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy patients and healthy volunteers.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Article
- Highly efficient image navigator based 3D whole-heart cardiac MRA at 0.55T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Automatic vessel segmentation and reformation of non-contrast coronary magnetic resonance angiography using transfer learning-based three-dimensional U-net with attention mechanism.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025Article
- High-resolution automated free-breathing coronary magnetic resonance angiography in comparison with coronary computed tomography angiography.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Development of a large-scale medical visual question-answering dataset.Communications medicine · 2024Article
- Enhancing hemodynamic stability: the role of liaison nurses in patient transfers to angiography.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- A hybrid deep image prior and compressed sensing reconstruction method for highly accelerated 3D coronary magnetic resonance angiography.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Automated detection of cardiac rest period for trigger delay calculation for image-based navigator coronary magnetic resonance angiography.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023Article
- Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Coronary Ischemia: A Challenging Vicious Circle.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Assessment of myocardial bridging and the pericoronary fat attenuation index on coronary computed tomography angiography: predicting coronary artery disease risk.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) accounting for the majority of cases. X-ray coronary angiography and computed tomography coronary angiography (CCTA) are the imaging modalities of choice for the assessment of CAD. However, the use of ionising radiation and iodinated contrast agents remain drawbacks. There is therefore a clinical need for an alternative modality for the early identification and longitudinal monitoring of CAD without these associated drawbacks. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) could be a potential alternative for the detection and monitoring of coronary arterial stenosis, without exposing patients to ionising radiation or iodinated contrast agents. Further advantages include its versatility, excellent soft tissue characterisation and suitability for repeat imaging. Despite the early promise of CMRA, widespread clinical utilisation remains limited due to long and unpredictable scan times, onerous scan planning, lower spatial resolution, as well as motion related image quality degradation. The past decade has brought about a resurgence in CMRA technology, with significant leaps in image acceleration, respiratory and cardiac motion estimation and advanced motion corrected or motion-resolved image reconstruction. With the advent of artificial intelligence, great advances are also seen in deep learning-based motion estimation, undersampled and super-resolution reconstruction promising further improvements of CMRA. This has enabled high spatial resolution (1 mm isotropic), 3D whole heart CMRA in a clinically feasible and reliable acquisition time of under 10 min. Furthermore, latest super-resolution image reconstruction approaches which are currently under evaluation promise acquisitions as short as 1 min. In this review, we will explore the recent technological advances that are designed to bring CMRA closer to clinical reality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.