Fuzzle 2.0: Ligand Binding in Natural Protein Building Blocks.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Retracing the evolution of a modern periplasmic binding protein.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
   Article
2. Structures of permuted halves of a modern ribose-binding protein.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2023
   Article
3. ProtGPT2 is a deep unsupervised language model for protein design.Nature communications · 2022
   Article
4. Folding and Evolution of a Repeat Protein on the Ribosome.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as