ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2021
Estimation of Muscle Mass in the Integrated Assessment of Patients on Hemodialysis.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Combined Use of Hydroxymethylbutyrate and Branched-Chain Amino Acids to Counteract Uremic Sarcopenia.Nutrients · 2026Trial
- Relationships of high mean corpuscular volume, low total iron binding capacity and protein-energy wasting in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Article
- Ultrasound evaluation of quadriceps muscle thickness and body fat distribution in children receiving maintenance hemodialysis: a cross-sectional case-control study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Comment on "Emotional and External Eating Behaviors Associated with Fat-Free Mass Loss Following Sleeve Gastrectomy".Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Association Between Nutritional Status and Severe Sarcopenia in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study with Diagnostic Model Development.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Novel prediction equations for appendicular skeletal muscle mass in hemodialysis patients: referenced against bioelectrical impedance analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Dialysis-imposed, weekly and seasonal patterns of physical activity: a multi-center prospective study in patients using a wearable activity tracker.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
- The role of lean body mass in predicting mortality in hemodialysis patients across different age groups.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Gait abnormalities and longitudinal fall risk in older patients with end-stage kidney disease and sarcopenia.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Body fluid volume calculated using the uric acid kinetic model relates to the vascular event.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2024Article
- High-Protein Nutritional Supplements Improve Nutritional Status in Malnourished Patients with Systemic Sclerosis.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Respiratory sarcopenia screening in dialysis patients: cross-sectional and multicentre study protocol.BMC nephrology · 2024Article
- Interrelationships between sarcopenia, bone turnover markers and low bone mineral density in patients on hemodialysis.Renal failure · 2023Article
- Clinical features and molecular mechanism of muscle wasting in end stage renal disease.BMB reports · 2023Review
- Simplified discriminant parameters for sarcopenia among patients undergoing haemodialysis.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2022Article
- The Impact of Functional Bars and Adapted Physical Activity on Quality of Life in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessment of muscle mass (MM) or its proxies, lean tissue mass (LTM) or fat-free mass (FFM), is an integral part of the diagnosis of protein-energy wasting (PEW) and sarcopenia in patients on hemodialysis (HD). Both sarcopenia and PEW are related to a loss of functionality and also increased morbidity and mortality in this patient population. However, loss of MM is a part of a wider spectrum, including inflammation and fluid overload. As both sarcopenia and PEW are amendable to treatment, estimation of MM regularly is therefore of major clinical relevance. Whereas, computer-assisted tomography (CT) or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is considered a reference method, it is unsuitable as a method for routine clinical monitoring. In this review, different bedside methods to estimate MM or its proxies in patients on HD will be discussed, with emphasis on biochemical methods, simplified creatinine index (SCI), bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS), and muscle ultrasound (US). Body composition parameters of all methods are related to the outcome and appear relevant in clinical practice. The US is the only parameter by which muscle dimensions are measured. BIS and SCI are also dependent on either theoretical assumptions or the use of population-specific regression equations. Potential caveats of the methods are that SCI can be influenced by residual renal function, BIS can be influenced by fluid overload, although the latter may be circumvented by the use of a three-compartment model, and that muscle US reflects regional and not whole body MM. In conclusion, both SCI and BIS as well as muscle US are all valuable methods that can be applied for bedside nutritional assessment in patients on HD and appear suitable for routine follow-up. The choice for either method depends on local preferences. However, estimation of MM or its proxies should always be part of a multidimensional assessment of the patient followed by a personalized treatment strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.