Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34485343›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2021

From Single Batch to Mass Production-Automated Platform Design Concept for a Phase II Clinical Trial Tissue Engineered Cartilage Product.

Sebastian Haeusner, Laura Herbst, Patrick Bittorf, Thomas Schwarz, Chris Henze, Marc Mauermann, Jelena Ochs, Robert Schmitt, Ulrich Blache, Anke Wixmerten and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Evolving Landscape of Potency Assays.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Sebastian HaeusnerTranslational Center Regenerative Therapies TLC-RT, Fraunhofer Institute for Silicate Research, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Laura HerbstFraunhofer Institute for Production Technology IPT, Aachen, Germany.
Patrick BittorfTranslational Center Regenerative Therapies TLC-RT, Fraunhofer Institute for Silicate Research, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Thomas SchwarzTranslational Center Regenerative Therapies TLC-RT, Fraunhofer Institute for Silicate Research, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Chris HenzeFraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV, Dresden, Germany.
Marc MauermannFraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV, Dresden, Germany.
Jelena OchsFraunhofer Institute for Production Technology IPT, Aachen, Germany.
Robert SchmittFraunhofer Institute for Production Technology IPT, Aachen, Germany.
Ulrich BlacheFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany.
Anke WixmertenDepartment of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Sylvie MiotDepartment of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Ivan MartinDepartment of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Oliver PulligTranslational Center Regenerative Therapies TLC-RT, Fraunhofer Institute for Silicate Research, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Fraunhofer Institute for Silicate Research · DEFraunhofer Institute for Production Technology IPT · DEFraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging · DEUniversity of Basel · CHFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology · DEUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMP) provide promising treatment options particularly for unmet clinical needs, such as progressive and chronic diseases where currently no satisfying treatment exists. Especially from the ATMP subclass of Tissue Engineered Products (TEPs), only a few have yet been translated from an academic setting to clinic and beyond. A reason for low numbers of TEPs in current clinical trials and one main key hurdle for TEPs is the cost and labor-intensive manufacturing process. Manual production steps require experienced personnel, are challenging to standardize and to scale up. Automated manufacturing has the potential to overcome these challenges, toward an increasing cost-effectiveness. One major obstacle for automation is the control and risk prevention of cross contaminations, especially when handling parallel production lines of different patient material. These critical steps necessitate validated effective and efficient cleaning procedures in an automated system. In this perspective, possible technologies, concepts and solutions to existing ATMP manufacturing hurdles are discussed on the example of a late clinical phase II trial TEP. In compliance to Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidelines, we propose a dual arm robot based isolator approach. Our novel concept enables complete process automation for adherent cell culture, and the translation of all manual process steps with standard laboratory equipment. Moreover, we discuss novel solutions for automated cleaning, without the need for human intervention. Consequently, our automation concept offers the unique chance to scale up production while becoming more cost-effective, which will ultimately increase TEP availability to a broader number of patients.

Indexed as

ATMPautologousautomationautomation & roboticscartilage regenerationGMPmanufacturingtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID34485343
PMCPMC8414576
OpenAlexW3195824722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.