ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2021
Nanocellulose-Based Scaffolds for Chondrogenic Differentiation and Expansion.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanocellulose as an Active Biointerface: Design Principles for Infection-Adaptive and Regenerative Biomaterials.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Laden Nanofibril-Reinforced Injectable and Self-Healing Alginate Dialdehyde/Gelatin Hydrogels with Enhanced Mechanical and Chondrogenic Performance In Vitro.Macromolecular bioscience · 2026Article
- Sustainable nanomaterials for precision dental medicine: green synthesis, therapeutic applications, and future directions.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Histological and biological evaluation of wheat straw-derived nanocellulose in a rat model of cutaneous wound healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Multidimensional biomimetic strategy integrating structural, functional and biological cues for enhanced tendon-to-bone interface regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Nanotechnology Driven Innovations in Modern Pharmaceutics: Therapeutics, Imaging, and Regeneration.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Synthesis and characterization of 3D gelatin/calcium hydroxide/dentin matrix proteins/propolis scaffolds for hard tissue engineering.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Environmental impact and sustainability of nanocellulose-based nitrated polymers in propellants.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Current Paradigms and Future Challenges in Harnessing Nanocellulose for Advanced Applications in Tissue Engineering: A Critical State-of-the-Art Review for Biomedicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Wood-Derived Hydrogels for Osteochondral Defect Repair.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Positive Regulation of S-Adenosylmethionine on Chondrocytic Differentiation via Stimulation of Polyamine Production and the Gene Expression of Chondrogenic Differentiation Factors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Review
- Review
- The Role of Polymeric Biomaterials in the Treatment of Articular Osteoarthritis.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Characterization of the Putative Acylated Cellulose Synthase Operon inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Delivery of Mesenchymal Stem Cell in Dialdehyde Methylcellulose-Succinyl-Chitosan Hydrogel Promotes Chondrogenesis in a Porcine Model.Polymers · 2022Article
- Comparative Analysis of Bacterial Cellulose Membranes Synthesized by ChosenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Extracellular Nucleotides Affect the Proangiogenic Behavior of Fibroblasts, Keratinocytes, and Endothelial Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanocellulose deserves special attention among the large group of biocompatible biomaterials. It exhibits good mechanical properties, which qualifies it for potential use as a scaffold imitating cartilage. However, the reconstruction of cartilage is a big challenge due to this tissue's limited regenerative capacity resulting from its lack of vascularization, innervations, and sparsely distributed chondrocytes. This feature restricts the infiltration of progenitor cells into damaged sites. Unfortunately, differentiated chondrocytes are challenging to obtain, and mesenchymal stem cells have become an alternative approach to promote chondrogenesis. Importantly, nanocellulose scaffolds induce the differentiation of stem cells into chondrocyte phenotypes. In this review, we present the recent progress of nanocellulose-based scaffolds promoting the development of cartilage tissue, especially within the emphasis on chondrogenic differentiation and expansion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.