Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34485231›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2021

Nominal Operating Envelope of Pod and Pen Style Electronic Cigarettes.

Edward C Hensel, Nathan C Eddingsaas, Qutaiba M Saleh, Shehan Jayasekera, S Emma Sarles, Mahagani Thomas, Bryan T Myers, Gary DiFrancesco, Risa J Robinson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edward C HenselDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States.
Nathan C EddingsaasDepartment of Chemistry and Materials Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States.
Qutaiba M SalehDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States.
Shehan JayasekeraDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States.
S Emma SarlesDepartment of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States.
Mahagani ThomasDepartment of Chemistry and Materials Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States.
Bryan T MyersDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States.
Gary DiFrancescoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States.
Risa J RobinsonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States.
Rochester Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Understanding the Association Between Electronic Cigarette Aerosol Emissions, Tobacco Product Characteristics and User Topography and Consumption BehaviorR21ES029984 · NIEHS · ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HENSEL, EDWARD CHARLES · 2019 to 2020
$403k
NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES029984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) employ integrated sensors to detect user puffing behavior and activate the heating coil to initiate aerosol generation. The minimum puff flow rate and duration at which the ENDS device begins to generate aerosol are important parameters in quantifying the viable operating envelope of the device and are essential to formulating a design of experiments for comprehensive emissions characterization. An accurate and unbiased method for quantifying the flow condition operating envelope of ENDS is needed to quantify product characteristics across research laboratories. This study reports an accurate, unbiased method for measuring the minimum and maximum aerosolization puff flow rate and duration of seven pod-style, four pen-style and two disposable ENDS. The minimum aerosolization flow rate ranged from 2.5 to 23 (mL/s) and the minimum aerosolization duration ranged from 0.5 to 1.0 (s) across the ENDS studied. The maximum aerosolization flow rate was defined to be when the onset of liquid aspiration was evident, at flow rates ranging from 50 to 88 (mL/s). Results are presented which provide preliminary estimates for the effective maximum aerosolization flow rate and duration envelope of each ENDS. The variation in operating envelope observed between ENDS products of differing design by various manufacturers has implications for development of standardized emissions testing protocols and data reporting required for regulatory approval of new products.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsVapingAerosolsNicotineResearch DesignAerosolsNicotineE-cigaretteelectronic nicotine delivery systemoperating envelopepen-stylepod-style

Identifiers

PMID34485231
PMCPMC8415835
OpenAlexW3194764732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.