ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Ten Color Multiparameter Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow and Apheresis Products for Assessment and Outcome Prediction in Multiple Myeloma Patients.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measurable residual disease assessment in apheresis product from multiple myeloma patients: Correlation with biology, depth of response and survival.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Review
- Application of mass cytometry to characterize hematopoietic stem cells in apheresis products of patients with hematological malignancies.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy · 2024Article
- Exploiting the CD200-CD200R immune checkpoint axis in multiple myeloma to enhance CAR T-cell therapy.Blood · 2024Article
- Prognostic Significance of Measurable Residual Disease Detection by Flow Cytometry in Autologous Stem Cell Apheresis Products in AML.HemaSphere · 2023Article
- Lumbar MR-based radiomics nomogram for detecting minimal residual disease in patients with multiple myeloma.European radiology · 2023Article
- Review
- High-risk multiple myeloma predicted by circulating plasma cells and its genetic characteristics.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn clinical trials (CTs), the assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) has proven to have prognostic value for multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and next-generation sequencing are currently used in CTs as effective tools for outcome prediction. We have previously described 6- and 8-color MFC panels with and without kappa/lambda, which were equally reliable in detecting aberrant plasma cells (aPC) in myeloma bone marrow (BM) specimens. This follow-up study a) established a highly sensitive single-tube 10-color MFC panel for MRD detection in myeloma samples carrying different disease burden (monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), MM), b) evaluated additional, rarely used markers included in this panel, and c) assessed MRD levels and the predictive value in apheresis vs. BM samples of MM patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). METHODS +
resultsThe 10-color MFC was performed in BM and apheresis samples of 128 MM and pre-MM (MGUS/SMM) patients. The markers CD28, CD200, CD19, and CD117 underwent closer examination. The analysis revealed distinct differences in these antigens between MM, MGUS/SMM, and patients under treatment. In apheresis samples, the 10-color panel determined MRD negativity in 44% of patients. Absence of aPC in apheresis corresponded with disease burden, cytogenetics, and response to induction. It also determined MRD negativity in BM samples after ASCT and was associated with improved progression-free survival.
conclusionThese results highlight the significance of the evaluation of both BM and apheresis samples with a novel highly sensitive 10-color MFC panel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.