Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34485105›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of orthopedics2021

Complications in growth-friendly spinal surgeries for early-onset scoliosis: Literature review.

Michał Latalski, Marek Fatyga, Ireneusz Sowa, Magdalena Wojciak, Grzegorz Starobrat, Anna Danielewicz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of orthopedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07429656 (Active Apex Correction), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07429656 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Active Apex Correction (APC) for Early Onset Scoliosis. Early Results of a Pilot Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2026 to 2029Enrolled15ConditionsEarly Onset Scoliosis (EOS)ArmsActive Apex Correction (APC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michał LatalskiChildren Orthopaedic Department, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin 20-093, Poland. michallatalski@umlub.pl.
Marek FatygaChildren Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital for Children, Lublin 20-093, Poland.
Ireneusz SowaDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin 20-093, Poland.
Magdalena WojciakDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin 20-093, Poland.
Grzegorz StarobratChildren Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital for Children, Lublin 20-093, Poland.
Anna DanielewiczChildren Orthopaedic Department, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin 20-093, Poland.
Medical University of Lublin · PLUniwersytecki Szpital Dziecięcy · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe treatments for early-onset scoliosis (EOS), defined as curvature of the spine with onset before 10 years of age, continue to pose a great challenge for pediatric orthopedics. The treatment goals for EOS include minimizing spinal deformity while maximizing thoracic volume and pulmonary function. Different surgical techniques have different advantages and drawbacks; however, the two major concerns in the management of EOS are repeated surgeries and complications.

aimTo review the current literature to assess the safety of EOS surgical treatment in terms of the rate of complications and unplanned surgeries.

methodsIn January 2021 two independent reviewers systematically searched three electronic medical databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase) for relevant articles. Every step of the review was done according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Due to the heterogeneity of articles and topics after data analysis, a descriptive (synthetic) analysis was performed.

resultsA total of 2136 articles were found. Forty articles were included in this systematic review, after applying our inclusion and exclusion criteria. EOS surgery has a varying but high rate of complications. The most frequent complications were categorized as implant (54%), general (17%), wound (15%) and alignment (12%). The rate of complications might have been even higher than reported, as some authors do not report all types of complications. About 54% of patients required unplanned surgeries due to complications, which comprised 15% of all surgeries.

conclusionThe literature concerning the definitions, collection, and interpretation of data regarding EOS surgery complications is often difficult to interpret. This creates problems in the comparison, analysis, and improvement of spine surgery practice. Additionally, this observation indicates that data on the incidence of complications can be underestimated, and should be interpreted with caution. Awareness of the high rate of complications of EOS surgery is crucial, and an optimal strategy for prevention should become a priority.

Indexed as

ComplicationsGrowth-friendly implantScoliosisSpineSurgeryTreatment

Identifiers

PMID34485105
PMCPMC8384615
OpenAlexW3192568203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.