Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34485073›Full record

ReviewIntegrative medicine research2022

The effectiveness and safety of complementary health approaches to managing postpartum pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Caroline A Smith, Emma Hill, Anna Denejkina, Charlene Thornton, Hannah G Dahlen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative medicine research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline A SmithGraduate Research School, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Emma HillSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Anna DenejkinaGraduate Research School, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Charlene ThorntonCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Hannah G DahlenSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Western Sydney University · AUFlinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen experience pain from a number of causes during the postpartum period. Although pharmacological pain relief has shown to be effective, the efficacy of non-pharmacological methods of pain relief will be of interest to breastfeeding women. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the efficacy and safety of complementary approaches to manage postpartum pain.

methodsA search of English language databases from their inception to 2020 was undertaken for randomised controlled trials and included primiparous and multiparous women who experienced postpartum pain up to two weeks post birth. The primary outcome was pain. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

resultsThirty trials were included in the review, 25 trials (2,413 women) were included in the meta-analysis. Two trials of massage found a reduction in pain following caesarean birth within the first 24 h post birth (MD -2.64, 95-2.82 to -2.46, 184 women, I

conclusionFurther high quality trials are needed to determine the safety and effectiveness of herbal ointment and massage during the early postpartum period.

Indexed as

Complementary therapiesPostpartum painSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34485073
PMCPMC8408636
OpenAlexW3186290384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.