Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34484992›Full record

ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2021

Treatment strategies for reflux esophagitis including a potassium-competitive acid blocker: A cost-effectiveness analysis in Japan.

Yasuki Habu, Ryuhei Hamasaki, Motonobu Maruo, Tatsuya Nakagawa, Yuki Aono, Daisaku Hachimine

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Vonoprazan versus lansoprazole in erosive esophagitis - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Acid peptic disorder compass: An Indian expert consensus on comprehensive management.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The role of vonoprazan in patients with erosive esophagitis.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasuki HabuDepartment of Gastroenterology Saiseikai-Noe Hospital Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1334-370X
Ryuhei HamasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology Saiseikai-Noe Hospital Osaka Japan.
Motonobu MaruoDepartment of Gastroenterology Saiseikai-Noe Hospital Osaka Japan.
Tatsuya NakagawaDepartment of Gastroenterology Saiseikai-Noe Hospital Osaka Japan.
Yuki AonoDepartment of Gastroenterology Saiseikai-Noe Hospital Osaka Japan.
Daisaku HachimineDepartment of Gastroenterology Saiseikai-Noe Hospital Osaka Japan.
Osaka Kaisei Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGastroesophageal reflux disease is a common condition, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the mainstays of treatment. However, concerns have been raised about the safety of PPIs. A potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), vonoprazan (VPZ), was recently introduced, which may provide clinical benefits. This study was performed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of alternative long-term strategies including continuous and discontinuous treatment with VPZ for the management of reflux esophagitis in Japan.

methodsA health state transition model was developed to capture the long-term management of reflux esophagitis. Four different strategies were compared: (a) intermittent PPI using lansoprazole (LPZ); (b) intermittent P-CAB; (c) maintenance PPI using LPZ; and (d) maintenance P-CAB.

resultsIntermittent P-CAB was the most cost-effective, and the number of days for which medication was required with this strategy was fewest. Maintenance PPI was more efficacious, but more costly than intermittent P-CAB. Maintenance P-CAB was more efficacious, but more costly than maintenance PPI. Co-payments were higher for maintenance PPI than for intermittent P-CAB, and for maintenance P-CAB than for maintenance PPI, which were considered reasonable for the majority of patients to improve symptoms.

conclusionsIntermittent P-CAB appears to be the strategy of choice for the majority of reflux esophagitis patients in clinical practice. If a patient is not satisfied with the symptom control of the current strategy, switching to a more effective strategy appears to be a reasonable option for the majority of patients.

Indexed as

cost‐effectivenessgastroesophageal reflux diseasepotassium‐competitive acid blockerproton pump inhibitorreflux esophagitisvonoprazan

Identifiers

PMID34484992
PMCPMC8411401
OpenAlexW3133041432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.