ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2021
Five Unapproved Drugs Found in Cognitive Enhancement Supplements.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leader-Inspired Nutrition: Promoting Safe Dietary Supplement Use for Service Members.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Use of dietary supplements by individuals with dementia - the caregivers' perspective.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025Article
- The Occurrence of Illicit Smart Drugs or Nootropics in Europe and Australia and Their Associated Dangers: Results from a Market Surveillance Study by 12 Official Medicines Control Laboratories.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Article
- Article
- Quality assessment of "naturally occurring" high-percentage L-dopa commercial products proposed as dietary supplements on the Internet: from labeling to analytical findings.Frontiers in chemistry · 2025Article
- Phenibut: A drug with one too many "buts".Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2024Review
- Adulteration of Brain Health (Cognitive, Mood, and Sleep Enhancement) Food Supplements by the Addition of Pharmaceutical Drugs: A Comprehensive Review of Analytical Approaches and Trends.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- General practitioners' role in safeguarding patients with dementia in their use of dietary supplements. A qualitative study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2024Article
- Prevalence of adulteration in dietary supplements and recommendations for safe supplement practices in sport.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Review
- Dietary Supplement Use in Middle-aged and Older Adults.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2022Article
- Home care service employees' contribution to patient safety in clients with dementia who use dietary supplements: a Norwegian survey.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2021Article
- Article
- Compounded medications for ocular surface disease.The ocular surface · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify the presence of unapproved pharmaceutical drugs in over-the-counter dietary supplements marketed to improve memory and cognitive function.
methodsSupplements were identified by searching 2 supplement databases for products labeled as containing omberacetam, aniracetam, phenylpiracetam, or oxiracetam, 4 drugs not approved for human use in the United States. Products were purchased online and analyzed using nontargeted liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry methods.
resultsIn the 10 products tested, omberacetam and aniracetam were detected along with 3 additional unapproved drugs (i.e., phenibut, vinpocetine and picamilon). By consuming recommended serving sizes, consumers could be exposed to pharmaceutical-level dosages of drugs including a maximum of 40.6 ± 0.4 mg omberacetam (typical pharmacologic dose of 10 mg), 502 ± 0.8 mg of aniracetam (typical pharmacologic dose 200-750 mg), 15.4 ± 0.3 mg of phenibut (typical pharmacologic dose 250-500 mg), 4.3 ± 0.1 mg of vinpocetine (typical pharmacologic dose 5-40 mg), and 90.1 ± 0.7 mg of picamilon (typical pharmacologic dose 50-200 mg). Several detected drugs were not declared on the label, and several declared drugs were not detected in the products. For those products with drug quantities provided on the labels, 75% (9/12) of declared quantities were inaccurate. Consumers could be exposed to up to four-fold greater than pharmaceutical dosages and as many as 4 unapproved drugs when using individual products.
conclusionsOver-the-counter cognitive enhancement supplements may contain multiple unapproved drugs. The health effects of consuming untested combinations of unapproved drugs at unpredictable dosages without clinician oversight in supplements are unknown.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.