Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34484889›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2021

Efficacy of Erenumab in the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Case Series.

Eliot Parascandolo, Kelsey Levinson, Paul Rizzoli, Roni Sharon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Pathophysiology and Management of Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  4. Trigeminal neuralgia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Neuropathic pain; what we know and what we should do about it.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eliot ParascandoloSackler Faculty of Medicine (EP, KL, RS), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Graham Headache Center (PR), Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and Department of Neurology (RS), Sheba-Tel HaShomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Kelsey LevinsonSackler Faculty of Medicine (EP, KL, RS), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Graham Headache Center (PR), Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and Department of Neurology (RS), Sheba-Tel HaShomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Paul RizzoliSackler Faculty of Medicine (EP, KL, RS), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Graham Headache Center (PR), Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and Department of Neurology (RS), Sheba-Tel HaShomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Roni SharonSackler Faculty of Medicine (EP, KL, RS), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Graham Headache Center (PR), Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and Department of Neurology (RS), Sheba-Tel HaShomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTrigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a chronic, often refractory, pain condition, which adversely affects the lives of patients. Current treatments are only mildly effective. Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies have been successfully studied in the treatment of migraines. CGRP plays a role in both TN and migraine. It is prudent to attempt CGRP monoclonal antibody therapy in TN. Erenumab, a human anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody medication, modulates CGRP, which is elevated in patients with TN. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of erenumab for patients with TN.

methodsRetrospective analysis was performed on data collected from 10 patients diagnosed with TN and treated with erenumab for 6 months. Pain was tracked using a numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) from 0 to 10. The effect of erenumab on NPRS after 6 months' time was the primary end point. Secondary end points included side effects to therapy, improvement in headache frequency in those with comorbid migraine, evaluating mood following therapy, and global mood improvement using scale (worse, no change, improved).

resultsNine of 10 patients (90.0%) reported improvement in pain severity and in global mood improvement. Three patients reported resolution of anxiety and/or depression. Side effects were minimal, with 3 patients reporting constipation, injection site reactions, or both.

conclusionsBased on these results, erenumab appears to be an efficacious treatment option for patients with refractory TN. Patients experienced improvement in pain, reduced frequency of headache, and improvement in mood. Treatment was well tolerated with only mild side effects reported. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that erenumab increases the probability of improved pain control in patients with medication-resistant TN.

Identifiers

PMID34484889
PMCPMC8382339
OpenAlexW3141392904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.