Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34484885›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2021

Industry Payments to Physicians and Prescribing Branded Memantine and Donepezil Combination.

Zachary A Marcum, Ching-Yuan Chang, Douglas Barthold, Holly M Holmes, Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zachary A MarcumDepartment of Pharmacy (ZAM, DB), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy (C-YC, W-HL-C), Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (C-YC, W-HL-C), College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville; and Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine (HMH), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School.
Ching-Yuan ChangDepartment of Pharmacy (ZAM, DB), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy (C-YC, W-HL-C), Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (C-YC, W-HL-C), College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville; and Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine (HMH), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School.
Douglas BartholdDepartment of Pharmacy (ZAM, DB), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy (C-YC, W-HL-C), Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (C-YC, W-HL-C), College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville; and Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine (HMH), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School.
Holly M HolmesDepartment of Pharmacy (ZAM, DB), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy (C-YC, W-HL-C), Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (C-YC, W-HL-C), College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville; and Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine (HMH), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School.
Wei-Hsuan Lo-CiganicDepartment of Pharmacy (ZAM, DB), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy (C-YC, W-HL-C), Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (C-YC, W-HL-C), College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville; and Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine (HMH), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School.
University of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnce-daily extended-released memantine with donepezil (hereafter memantine/donepezil) may improve medication adherence but has a 60-fold higher cost compared with combined generic components. Little is known about factors associated with prescribing memantine/donepezil. We examined the association between pharmaceutical industry payments to physicians and prescribing memantine/donepezil in Medicare.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted. Using 2015-2016 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments and Part D prescription databases, we identified unique physicians who prescribed ≥11 memantine/donepezil prescriptions from 2015 to 2016. Outcome variable was the number of memantine/donepezil prescriptions written per physician per year. The key independent variable was physician receipt of industry payments defined in 2 models: (1) number of payments and (2) amount of payment ($100 units) for memantine/donepezil received per physician per year. Multivariable Poisson regression was used, adjusting for potential confounders.

resultsAmong 4,895 unique eligible physicians in 2015-2016, the median number of memantine/donepezil prescriptions per physician per year was 19.5 (25th percentile 13, 75th percentile 32). Physicians received between 0 and 75 payments per year (median 1, 25th percentile 0, 75th percentile 2.5) for memantine/donepezil, totaling an average of $92 per year (median $10.5, 25th percentile $0, 75th percentile $33.20). Every 1 additional payment received was associated with a 2% increase in new memantine/donepezil prescriptions prescribed per physician per year (rate ratio [RR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.02). Every $100 increase in payment for memantine/donepezil was associated with a 0.3% increase in new memantine/donepezil prescriptions prescribed per physician per pear (RR 1.003, 95% CI 1.002-1.004).

conclusionsReceipt of industry payments for memantine/donepezil was independently associated with increased likelihood of physician prescribing memantine/donepezil in Medicare.

Identifiers

PMID34484885
PMCPMC8382368
OpenAlexW3032520913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.