ArticleJournal of dental sciences2021
Assessment of root canal morphology of mandibular permanent anterior teeth in an Iraqi subpopulation by cone-beam computed tomography.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- CBCT assessment of root and canal morphology in mandibular anterior teeth in a Chilean subpopulation using an alphanumeric coding system.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Association between lingual canal detection and buccolingual root width in mandibular anterior teeth: a retrospective CBCT Study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Application of machine learning in predicting of MB2 canal in permanent maxillary first and second molars: A CBCT study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Imaging Findings of Clinical Significance in Endodontics During Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanning of the Upper Airway-The Anterior, Bilateral, C-Shaped, Dual of Mandibular Root Canals: A Brief Case Report.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Micro-computed and cone beam-computed tomographies for identification of Canals' morphological patterns of mandibular canines in Egyptian and Saudi Subpopulations: A comparative study.The Saudi dental journal · 2024Article
- Root canal morphology of permanent mandibular anterior teeth in a Pakistani population: A cone beam computed tomography assessment.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Prevalence of Isthmi and Root Canal Configurations in Mandibular Permanent Teeth Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.BioMed research international · 2024Article
- Analysis of mandibular molar anatomy in Taiwanese individuals using cone beam computed tomography.Journal of dental sciences · 2024Article
- Accuracy verification of dental cone-beam computed tomography of mandibular incisor root canals and assessment of its morphology and aging-related changes.Anatomy & cell biology · 2023Article
- Analysis of Root Canal Characteristics in Permanent Canine Teeth Among 270 Saudi Subjects: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Article
- Evaluation of root and canal morphologies of permanent canines in a Saudi Arabian sub population using cone-beam computed tomography.Journal of dental sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Root Morphology and Canal Configuration of Permanent Canines Among Saudi Population: Systematic Review and Comparison with Worldwide Studies.International journal of general medicine · 2022Review
- Evaluation of Radix Entomolaris and Middle Mesial Canal in Mandibular Permanent First Molars in an Iraqi Subpopulation Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of root canal morphology of permanent mandibular incisors - Prevalence and related factors.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background/purposeEndodontic treatment is basically dependent on knowledge of the root canal anatomy. This study aimed to analyze the root canal configuration of mandibular anterior teeth in an Iraqi subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 305 CBCT scans involving 1794 mandibular permanent anterior teeth were evaluated. The number of roots, root canals, root canal system configuration according to Vertucci classification, and bilateral symmetry in root number and root canal number were recorded and statistically analyzed. The effects of gender and age on the incidence of root canal morphology and root canal number were investigated. Chi-square test was used to determine the level of significance (p < 0.05) and Kappa value was used to check reliability of results of the research.
resultsAmong the study patients, double root canals were found in (right 26.1% and left 26.4%) mandibular central incisors, in lateral incisors (right 28% and left 30.4%) and canines (right 11.7% and left 11%). Most teeth (77.8%) had a Type I Vertucci configuration and Type V was the least common and only present in canines (0.8%). All examined incisors presented with only one root and only around 2% of canines had two roots. Gender differences were identified for central incisors, while for lateral incisors and canines there were none. Patients older than 60 years had fewer teeth with double root canals (p < 0.05). Slight bilateral asymmetries appeared in central, lateral incisors, and canines in relation to root and root canal numbers.
conclusionSingle rooted with Type I canal configuration is the most prevalent in mandibular anterior teeth in the Iraqi subpopulation. However, the incidence of more than one root canal with different canal configurations is also detected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.