Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34484553›Full record

ArticleScanning2021

Effect of Amalgam Restorations and Operation Parameters on Diagnostic Accuracy of Caries Detection Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study.

Mohamed Mehanny, Rahaf A AlMohareb, Marcel Noujeim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scanning, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohamed MehannyBasic Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2294-2720
Rahaf A AlMoharebClinical Dental Science Department, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7536-359X
Marcel NoujeimDepartment of Comprehensive Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1729-5485
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SAThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in detecting noncavitated approximal caries at different exposure parameters and to assess the impact of artifacts generated by amalgam restorations in an in vitro study. Seventy-eight approximal surfaces of extracted teeth were prepared with intentionally created noncavitated approximal caries of different depths; then, thirteen teeth with class 2 amalgam restorations were replaced with one tooth with normal surfaces in each block. CBCT volumes for all teeth were acquired using a Planmeca Promax 3D Mid imaging unit before and after placement of amalgam teeth, with different exposure parameters at low and high definition, both applying and omitting the Metal Artifact Reduction algorithm. The lesions were classified into four groups with regard to lesion extension. All teeth underwent histological analysis as gold standard. The histological examination showed that the distribution of lesions was as follows: 39.8% sound, enamel lesions of less and more than half the enamel thickness each 17.8%, and 24.6% dentin lesions. The detection sensitivity was found to be 0.972%, and specificity was found to be 0.937% for the detection of noncavitated approximal initial enamel and dentin caries. The highest diagnostic accuracy was found when using operating parameters of 90 kV

Indexed as

Dental CariesDental Caries SusceptibilityArtifactsCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID34484553
PMCPMC8384543
OpenAlexW3194499593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.