Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34484482›Full record

ArticleCanadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC

A Twitter analysis of World Pharmacists Day 2020 images: Sending the wrong messages.

Talia M Santarossa, Kaitlyn E Watson, Ross T Tsuyuki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Public's Perception of Pharmacist.Journal of patient experience · 2023
    Article
  3. Pharmacy, we have an image problem . . . (and here's a solution).Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Talia M SantarossaEPICORE Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
Kaitlyn E WatsonEPICORE Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6617-9398
Ross T TsuyukiEPICORE Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacists are often depicted as dispensers of medication as opposed to health professionals who provide patient care. Our objective was to identify how pharmacists' roles were portrayed in images on Twitter for World Pharmacists Day (WPD) 2020.

methodsA qualitative content analysis was undertaken to evaluate the images of pharmacists on WPD. Tweets were included that had a photo or image, used 1 of 5 WPD hashtags and were posted between September 24 and 26, 2020. Thematic analysis was performed independently by 2 investigators. Tweets were categorized into 5 groups: 1) drug distribution roles, 2) patient care roles, 3) no described roles, 4) not professional/unprofessional roles and 5) not relevant. Subgroup analysis was performed for the users who posted the tweets.

resultsOf the 970 tweets analyzed, only 11% of the overall tweets portrayed the patient care roles of pharmacists, whereas 51% portrayed drug distribution roles and 29% did not describe any particular roles of pharmacists. These proportions were similar between subgroups of tweeters. DISCUSSION: WPD is intended to promote and advocate for the pharmacy profession. The results of our study show poor messaging of pharmacists' roles and reflect a missed opportunity to showcase the full scope of pharmacy practice.

conclusionBased on the images tweeted on WPD 2020, the diversity of pharmacists' practice as skilled health care practitioners was lost in a sea of tweets portraying pharmacists' roles in drug distribution. We hope that pharmacists and pharmacy organizations will awaken to this self-induced problem for WPD 2021.

Identifiers

PMID34484482
PMCPMC8408907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.