ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2021
Evidence-Based Analysis on Observation for Nursing Care of Patients with Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping.
Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retracted: Evidence-Based Analysis on Observation for Nursing Care of Patients with Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-12Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, data analysis was performed on 52 patients. According to the different outcomes and discharge diagnosis of patients, data on sedative use, emotions, behavioral abnormalities, hearing loss, pain, total time on board the IABP (intra-aortic balloon pumping), and days of hospitalization of patients were collected. The data were subjected to frequency analysis, paired chi-square analysis, chi-square test, Poisson regression analysis, and stepwise regression analysis. Some findings of the analysis included the following: Between outcome and admission diagnosis, the analysis showed that significant differences existed between paired data. Patients with heart failure and acute myocardial infarction are in an unhealed state, and most patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease, myocarditis, and heart disease showed improvement. The samples taken by different sedatives showed no significant differences in the emotional and behavioral abnormalities, hearing loss, and pain. A total of 1 item of hospital stay had a significant negative impact on the total operation time of IABP. However, discharge diagnosis and admission diagnosis did not affect the total time on board the IABP. The dorsalis pedis artery pulse condition has a significant negative effect on the total time on board the IABP.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.