ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2021
Machine Learning-Based Facial Beauty Prediction and Analysis of Frontal Facial Images Using Facial Landmarks and Traditional Image Descriptors.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for facial attractiveness assessment in orthodontics: model development and evaluation.European journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
- Optimized facial landmark modeling with medical aesthetic constraints by a multi-objective genetic algorithm.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Where Is the Artificial Intelligence Applied in Dentistry? Systematic Review and Literature Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Use of Advanced Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Medicine, Forensic Anthropology and Clinical Anatomy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The beauty industry has seen rapid growth in multiple countries and due to its applications in entertainment, the analysis and assessment of facial attractiveness have received attention from scientists, physicians, and artists because of digital media, plastic surgery, and cosmetics. An analysis of techniques is used in the assessment of facial beauty that considers facial ratios and facial qualities as elements to predict facial beauty. Here, the facial landmarks are extracted to calculate facial ratios according to Golden Ratios and Symmetry Ratios, and an ablation study is performed to find the best performing feature set from extracted ratios. Subsequently, Gray Level Covariance Matrix (GLCM), Hu's Moments, and Color Histograms in the HSV space are extracted as texture, shape, and color features, respectively. Another ablation study is performed to find out which feature performs the best when concatenated with the facial landmarks. Experimental results show that the concatenation of primary facial characteristics with facial landmarks improved the prediction score of facial beauty. Four models are trained, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Linear Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) on a dataset of 5500 frontal facial images, and amongst them, KNN performs the best for the concatenated features achieving a Pearson's Correlation Coefficient of 0.7836 and a Mean Squared Error of 0.0963. Our analysis also provides us with insights into how different machine learning models can understand the concept of facial beauty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.