Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34484311›Full record

ArticleCurrent zoology2020

Olfactory receptor gene evolution is unusually rapid across Tetrapoda and outpaces chemosensory phenotypic change.

Laurel R Yohe, Matteo Fabbri, Michael Hanson, Bhart-Anjan S Bhullar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current zoology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The olfactory bulb endocast as a proxy for mammalian olfaction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Divergent sensory and immune gene evolution in sea turtles with contrasting demographic and life histories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laurel R YoheDepartment of Earth & Planetary Science, Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1567-8749
Matteo FabbriDepartment of Earth & Planetary Science, Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
Michael HansonDepartment of Earth & Planetary Science, Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5458-5724
Bhart-Anjan S BhullarDepartment of Earth & Planetary Science, Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
American Museum of Natural History · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemosensation is the most ubiquitous sense in animals, enacted by the products of complex gene families that detect environmental chemical cues and larger-scale sensory structures that process these cues. While there is a general conception that olfactory receptor (

Indexed as

chemosensationdiversifying selectionolfactionolfactory bulbolfactory receptortetrapod

Identifiers

PMID34484311
PMCPMC7750991
OpenAlexW3083636516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.