ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021
RetroScan: An Easy-to-Use Pipeline for Retrocopy Annotation and Visualization.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Haplotype-resolved genome of Citrus × sinensis 'Pera IAC', the most widely cultivated sweet orange in Brazil.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Gene retroposition and functional diversification of retrocopies in the Rhus gall aphid Schlechtendalia chinensis.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Comprehensive computational insights into Plasmodium retrocopies reveals potential roles in virulence-associated functions.Genetica · 2026Article
- Transposable element dynamics in Arthropoda genomes and their impacts on the evolution of functional genes.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Genomic exploration of retrocopies in Insect pests of plants and their role in the expansion of heat shock proteins superfamily as evolutionary targets.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- De novo genome assembly and genome skims reveal LTRs dominate the genome of a limestone endemic Mountainsnail (Oreohelix idahoensis).BMC genomics · 2022Article
- The Genome of the Mimosoid LegumeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retrocopies, which are considered "junk genes," are occasionally formed via the insertion of reverse-transcribed mRNAs at new positions in the genome. However, an increasing number of recent studies have shown that some retrocopies exhibit new biological functions and may contribute to genome evolution. Hence, the identification of retrocopies has become very meaningful for studying gene duplication and new gene generation. Current pipelines identify retrocopies through complex operations using alignment programs and filter scripts in a step-by-step manner. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a simple and convenient retrocopy annotation tool. Here, we report the development of RetroScan, a publicly available and easy-to-use tool for scanning, annotating and displaying retrocopies, consisting of two components: an analysis pipeline and a visual interface. The pipeline integrates a series of bioinformatics software programs and scripts for identifying retrocopies in just one line of command. Compared with previous methods, RetroScan increases accuracy and reduces false-positive results. We also provide a Shiny app for visualization. It displays information on retrocopies and their parental genes that can be used for the study of retrocopy structure and evolution. RetroScan is available at https://github.com/Vicky123wzy/RetroScan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.