Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34484254›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2021

Crucial Cell Signaling Compounds Crosstalk and Integrative Multi-Omics Techniques for Salinity Stress Tolerance in Plants.

Rajesh K Singhal, Debanjana Saha, Milan Skalicky, Udit N Mishra, Jyoti Chauhan, Laxmi P Behera, Devidutta Lenka, Subhash Chand, Vivek Kumar, Prajjal Dey and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Learning fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Non-destructive detection ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Rajesh K SinghalICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, India.
Debanjana SahaDepartment of Biotechnology, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Bhubaneswar, India.
Milan SkalickyDepartment of Botany and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Udit N MishraFaculty of Agriculture, Sri Sri University, Cuttack, India.
Jyoti ChauhanNarayan Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Gopal Narayan Singh University, Jamuhar, India.
Laxmi P BeheraDepartment of Agriculture Biotechnology, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, India.
Devidutta LenkaDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, India.
Subhash ChandICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, India.
Vivek KumarInstitute of Agriculture Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Prajjal DeyFaculty of Agriculture, Sri Sri University, Cuttack, India.
InduICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, India.
Saurabh PandeyDepartment of Agriculture, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India.
Pavla VachovaDepartment of Botany and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Aayushi GuptaDepartment of Botany and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Marian BresticDepartment of Botany and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Ayman El SabaghDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kafrelsheikh, Kafr El Sheikh, Egypt.
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZIndian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute · INOdisha University of Agriculture and Technology · INSri Sri University · INBanaras Hindu University · INCenturion University of Technology and Management · INGuru Nanak Dev University · INNarayan Medical College and Hospital · INSiirt Üniversitesi · TRSlovak University of Agriculture · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of rapid climate change, abiotic stresses are the primary cause for yield gap in major agricultural crops. Among them, salinity is considered a calamitous stress due to its global distribution and consequences. Salinity affects plant processes and growth by imposing osmotic stress and destroys ionic and redox signaling. It also affects phytohormone homeostasis, which leads to oxidative stress and eventually imbalances metabolic activity. In this situation, signaling compound crosstalk such as gasotransmitters [nitric oxide (NO), hydrogen sulfide (H

Indexed as

antioxidant defensecrosstalkhomeostasisomics approachesplant growth regulatorssalinity stress tolerancesignaling network

Identifiers

PMID34484254
PMCPMC8414894
OpenAlexW3194254073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.